Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Prince Andrew (Enough Said)
https:/
I’ve read the transcript but I’m not sure how anyone could be ‘forced’ to have sex at 17 yrs old unless they had a gun to her head, otherwise this would surely be rape wouldn’t it?
I’m no fan of PA, far from it but again just wondered how she was ‘forced’ to have sex with him and other prominent figures,and I’m not saying she’s to blame either but I would like to know
I’ve read the transcript but I’m not sure how anyone could be ‘forced’ to have sex at 17 yrs old unless they had a gun to her head, otherwise this would surely be rape wouldn’t it?
I’m no fan of PA, far from it but again just wondered how she was ‘forced’ to have sex with him and other prominent figures,and I’m not saying she’s to blame either but I would like to know
Answers
I don’t think he has any reason to “man up” (although yes I still think he’s a toad). There ought to be no charge. What happened happened. It was poor judgement on BOTH sides. At 17 she took a choice. A choice which an older wiser her wld not have made. She was young n dumb but had free will. He was older n wiser but thought with his ***. Nothing more complicated than...
08:19 Tue 10th Aug 2021
I've never actually studied the photograph until now. I don't think it would be too difficult to put your arm around some-one's waist in such a pose. However, i do see a weird shadow on PA's chin. The shadow does not appear on either side of the Prince, nor on his shirt. Not saying that the snap has been 'doctored' only that it looks a tad weird.
When you look at the photo:
https:/
Take a look at what the young girl is wearing on her bottom half - see-through trousers. They are standing on an upstairs landing. Prince Andrew has his arm around her waist. Ghislaine Maxwell is there. Jeffrey Epstein is presumably taking the photo? It does not show our prince in a good light.
Epstein, the convicted sex offender, is dead. Maxwell is in jail awaiting prosecution. Prince Andrew? Free as a bird.
This photo is disastrous for Andrew. Why would it even be taken? Most likely for Epstein's security, in case Andrew ever tried to put one over on Epstein, Epstein would have the material to do some damage back. Maybe it's not the worst photo that could have come out ...
https:/
Take a look at what the young girl is wearing on her bottom half - see-through trousers. They are standing on an upstairs landing. Prince Andrew has his arm around her waist. Ghislaine Maxwell is there. Jeffrey Epstein is presumably taking the photo? It does not show our prince in a good light.
Epstein, the convicted sex offender, is dead. Maxwell is in jail awaiting prosecution. Prince Andrew? Free as a bird.
This photo is disastrous for Andrew. Why would it even be taken? Most likely for Epstein's security, in case Andrew ever tried to put one over on Epstein, Epstein would have the material to do some damage back. Maybe it's not the worst photo that could have come out ...
I think Andy is a member of "The Untouchables" similar to the " Con Club ", and should recieve a couple of billion £s. in compensation and a free Pardon and all the blame put onto the Lady in question for enticing Andrew into a difficult situation, poor Andrew didn't know he was committing an offence.
After all the Royals are above the LAW , or so they think.
After all the Royals are above the LAW , or so they think.
// William, just tried that pose with my daughter,Did with ease.// dirty danny boy ! - sozza reader - c/p ing again
//It does not show our prince in a good light.// and under precisely which act ( of New York state) is that a crime?
There is nt one - I hear the usual suspects sullenly admit without any grace at all.
when all the speculation has died back
we must ( still ) wait and see.
1300 Beeb not giving the Jiuffre lawyers free rein to pontificate
//It does not show our prince in a good light.// and under precisely which act ( of New York state) is that a crime?
There is nt one - I hear the usual suspects sullenly admit without any grace at all.
when all the speculation has died back
we must ( still ) wait and see.
1300 Beeb not giving the Jiuffre lawyers free rein to pontificate
// Why was he committing an offence, Gulliver?//
er no - - - ehy was he doing it - good question
What offence was he committing, Gulliver?
none - at first glance. - She is over 16 and that was London innit?
Gave the Beeb free rein to replay the best bits of the disastrous interview,
which the Randy One, reported was 'OK' didnt he?
er no - - - ehy was he doing it - good question
What offence was he committing, Gulliver?
none - at first glance. - She is over 16 and that was London innit?
Gave the Beeb free rein to replay the best bits of the disastrous interview,
which the Randy One, reported was 'OK' didnt he?
For her hindsight seems to be a wonderful thing, especially where dollars are available. I don't see how there can be any evidence, it seems to be all her own version. If it was so bad why didn't she leave or is she going to suggest that she was kept as a prisoner? I know enough people who have had dealings with PA and he seems to be as odious as he comes across but in this I don't see a case.
-- answer removed --
Latest Posts
ChatterBank4 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles29 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles31 mins ago
Crosswords64 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.