Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Surely Boris Has To Go Now?
Who is sticking up for Boris now? None of the papers as far as I can see.
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ politic s/2022/ feb/01/ zero-sh ame-how -the-pa pers-co vered-a nger-at -boris- johnson -over-s ue-gray -report
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by diddlydo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No, never have and never will happen. And it's a defence against replacing him, with somebody with the same faults, but no strengths, which is what we usually get.
His job was to work out the safest and best advice for the whole population, in a pandemic. I didn't agree with it all, but I think he did his job.
His job was to work out the safest and best advice for the whole population, in a pandemic. I didn't agree with it all, but I think he did his job.
// They were parties... that's all.//
As I said before, the parties are much less relevant than the denials. Even setting aside the basic principle that those who make the rules should clearly follow the rules, denying repeatedly that said parties took place is a far more serious issue than the parties themselves.
This doesn't address your final question, but at a basic level I'd like to see someone in charge whose policies I may disagree with but whose basic decency as a human being is not in question. I don't accept that there is no such politician, either in the Tories or any other party.
As I said before, the parties are much less relevant than the denials. Even setting aside the basic principle that those who make the rules should clearly follow the rules, denying repeatedly that said parties took place is a far more serious issue than the parties themselves.
This doesn't address your final question, but at a basic level I'd like to see someone in charge whose policies I may disagree with but whose basic decency as a human being is not in question. I don't accept that there is no such politician, either in the Tories or any other party.
Regarding publishing the report in full, I watched the PM giving his statement. Fellow Tory, Mark Harper, asked if he would commit to publishing the final report in full.
I have listened to it again and his response concluded with, "people have given all sorts of evidence in the expectation it would not necessarily be published, Mr Speaker. At that stage I will take a decision about what to publish, Mr Speaker."
Unless there were a legally binding agreement not to publish their evidence, why would folk jump to the conclusion it would not be?
I have listened to it again and his response concluded with, "people have given all sorts of evidence in the expectation it would not necessarily be published, Mr Speaker. At that stage I will take a decision about what to publish, Mr Speaker."
Unless there were a legally binding agreement not to publish their evidence, why would folk jump to the conclusion it would not be?
-- answer removed --
That's fine, but the rest of us aren't obliged to match your low standards. Deliberately misleading Parliament, on any issue, is regarded seriously and should remain serious.
There's also a certain contradiction in arguing that lying about parties isn't serious, because the parties weren't serious, when if that was a case there was no need to lie in the first place. This is the point of honesty. Being open about the mistake would have killed the issue very quickly, in the eyes of the public (or at least most of them).
There's also a certain contradiction in arguing that lying about parties isn't serious, because the parties weren't serious, when if that was a case there was no need to lie in the first place. This is the point of honesty. Being open about the mistake would have killed the issue very quickly, in the eyes of the public (or at least most of them).
> everyone lies. That's just a question of what about.
There's a big difference between "everyone lies all of the time" and "everyone lies sometimes".
So when it comes to the question of "what about", when you're PM, you don't lie to Parliament. If you do, and you're found out, you go in disgrace.
That it was over something apparently so minor as parties is immaterial, in fact it almost makes it worse.
There's a big difference between "everyone lies all of the time" and "everyone lies sometimes".
So when it comes to the question of "what about", when you're PM, you don't lie to Parliament. If you do, and you're found out, you go in disgrace.
That it was over something apparently so minor as parties is immaterial, in fact it almost makes it worse.
Boris is a decent human being. He makes mistakes and misjudgments, but he's been presented with an unprecedented task and he's worked damned hard. In his situation if I was asked about illegal parties at Downing Street I too would deny them because I don’t consider work colleagues having a glass of wine together at work to be illegal at all. I regard this purposefully whipped-up hysteria as a complete nonsense designed wholly to create discord and to bring the Prime Minister down. Perhaps Boris thinks the same - and that doesn't make him a liar.
pixie374
True. And I don't have low standards, btw. Dishonesty is the worst crime in my view. But- with the system we have, I have no idea what people are expecting.
———
Probably and reasonably expected the government who made the strict rules to be just as stringent and set an example by following them rigidly ?
You are correct : you have no idea
The queen certainly did and even declined BJs toadying offer to relax the rules just for her
She knew that it was not the done thing
She showed how you lead by example and showed stoic resolution
Boris and the gang showed how you ignore the rules
Fail to apply them and flagrantly disregard the sacrifices of the public
Yet he still has the affront to cling to power
What an utter disgrace
True. And I don't have low standards, btw. Dishonesty is the worst crime in my view. But- with the system we have, I have no idea what people are expecting.
———
Probably and reasonably expected the government who made the strict rules to be just as stringent and set an example by following them rigidly ?
You are correct : you have no idea
The queen certainly did and even declined BJs toadying offer to relax the rules just for her
She knew that it was not the done thing
She showed how you lead by example and showed stoic resolution
Boris and the gang showed how you ignore the rules
Fail to apply them and flagrantly disregard the sacrifices of the public
Yet he still has the affront to cling to power
What an utter disgrace
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.