I'm Beginning To Like This Guy!

[Sqad]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10500557/Prince-Andrews-ex-massage-therapist-claims-Royal-constant-sex-pest.html

[pixie374]

True... privacy should be private. However, he has had quite a privileged life on the understanding it is a public one.
Stupid, arrogant, desperate, creepy... hard to tell why it never crossed his mind.

[andy-hughes]

Speak for yourself Sqad.

If I was living a millionaire lifestyle courtesy of the tax payer through nothing more than an accident of birth, I'd have the sense to appreciate that I have been public property since day one and behave accordingly.

It's not rocket science.

[andy-hughes]

Pix and I cross-posted, and clearly she sees him as I so.

[Sqad]

Unfortunately human behaviour whatever your birth is far more complicated than mere rocket science.

[Sqad]

Yes, she does andy.

[naomi24]

He’s actually very handsome - certainly by far the best looking of the bunch - or at least he was when he was younger. That said, I think he’s an incredibly stupid man, - a man of high breeding with no breeding whatsoever.

[Ellipsis]

> but to have the most intimate aspects of your sexual exploits opened up to the media on an almost daily routine, is not pleasant

Then perhaps he shouldn't go around (allegedly) shagging sex-trafficked 17-year-olds. This woman would have kept her gob shut about his sex pest nature ... she probably saw a lot of it in other men too, in her role as a massage therapist. The reason she's piped up is that Andy is protesting his innocence of something much worse, claiming virtuousness when she knows it's not true. That doesn't mean he did shag an innocent victim but she, from her position of relatively more knowledge than you or I possess, can well believe he did.

[Sqad]

All very true Ellipsis, however hindsight is a valuable tool used after the event.

[Peter Pedant]

well I am glad everyone has abandoned all this chuffy-chuffy "lets wait until the case has ground to a halt in 2025"
and got down to the nitty gritty in early 2022

much more fun

as for the Randy One, I think he laid with ladies of the night and paid them off ( OK one of his frenz paid them off)

[Atheist]

Ugly old fat white men and ugly old fat white women are all human beings with dreams and desires. Just like handsome skinny non-white men and women. Your personal tastes shouldn't really extend to condemning people for their longings. Aggressive demands is something else. But one way to get sex is to ask every man/woman you meet if they would like to do it with you. If they say no, then you should respect that. If they say yes, then you have both struck lucky.

[Ellipsis]

> one way to get sex is to ask every man/woman you meet if they would like to do it with you. If they say no, then you should respect that.

A bit late for respect at that point ...

[andy-hughes]

Atheist - That is one way.

Another is to never have anyone say no to you throughout your entire life.

That way you can assume that every stranger who has sex with you is doing so because of your own irresistible fabulousness, and never have to think that it might not be like that.

That way you are always happy, and since that's all that ever matters, who cares.

[Atheist]

Ellipsis; is it disrespectful to ask a woman if she would like to have sex with you? Surely it's a polite way to act. Is it disrespectful to ask if she would like to go out to dinner with you?

[Atheist]

A-H; I don't really 'get' your point. Sorry.

[Atheist]

Women aren't all fluffy little butterflies who don't fancy a bit of fun.

[Ellipsis]

Atheist, if she's married and 28, you're married and 68, yes, quite disrespectful ...

[Atheist]

Ellipsis. Why? If I meet an attractive woman (regardless of age) And politely ask if she would consent to have sexual pleasure with me, is that disrespectful? It's not rape. It's not gaslighting. It's not bullying. It's not aggressive. What is it?

[andy-hughes]

Being a presumptuous oaf?

[Ellipsis]

Oh dear. I'll leave you to it, Atheist ...

[Atheist]

Andy; I ask a woman a question. I do not presume that she would say 'yes'. She sees that I am not a rapist or a sadist. She replies as she wishes. Two adults exchange a few words heart to heart.
I presume that a woman can answer a straight question without falling into a faint. If she does fall into a faint then I realise I have been insensitive and I loosen her clothing..... Oh god, this is ridiculous. Are we living in Victorian times?