News1 min ago
Now There’s A Surprise !
Answers
Prince Andrew is an arrogant buffoon and always has been, and on balance I suspect he probably did shag Giuffre, so he's paid her off to make the court case go away, and he will now forever be tainted. But... What happened to Giuffre wanting her day in court and it not being about money? Surely the fact that American civil cases are generally settled on the steps of...
07:59 Wed 16th Feb 2022
// his reputation is intact. //
I realise it isn’t. Not that it was great to begin with.
Rather than his sleazy goings on, I am more interested in Andrew’s shady dealings in the arms industry, in Yemen, Azerbaijan and Saudi with BAE. His small fortune was built on exporting deadly arms to dodgy Arabs, and the death and misery that brought on the poor unfortunates were those arms landed.
I realise it isn’t. Not that it was great to begin with.
Rather than his sleazy goings on, I am more interested in Andrew’s shady dealings in the arms industry, in Yemen, Azerbaijan and Saudi with BAE. His small fortune was built on exporting deadly arms to dodgy Arabs, and the death and misery that brought on the poor unfortunates were those arms landed.
Prince Andrew is an arrogant buffoon and always has been, and on balance I suspect he probably did shag Giuffre, so he's paid her off to make the court case go away, and he will now forever be tainted.
But...
What happened to Giuffre wanting her day in court and it not being about money?
Surely the fact that American civil cases are generally settled on the steps of the court is irrelevant in this case isn't it given Giuffre was quite clear that she wanted her day in court and it wasn't about money?
Or is the actual truth is that it was about money all along?
If anybody truly believes the settlement is just a donation to a charity and she isn't trousering a shed load herself (possibly more than the donation even), I have some magic beans to sell if anybody is interested.
But...
What happened to Giuffre wanting her day in court and it not being about money?
Surely the fact that American civil cases are generally settled on the steps of the court is irrelevant in this case isn't it given Giuffre was quite clear that she wanted her day in court and it wasn't about money?
Or is the actual truth is that it was about money all along?
If anybody truly believes the settlement is just a donation to a charity and she isn't trousering a shed load herself (possibly more than the donation even), I have some magic beans to sell if anybody is interested.