Donate SIGN UP

Starmer And Rayner Cleared. Will This Be Accepted By Right Wing Abers?

Avatar Image
Atheist | 20:24 Fri 08th Jul 2022 | News
84 Answers
Will this be accepted by right wing abers? Or will they play the MSM conspiracy card?

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/08/keir-starmer-cleared-durham-police-breaking-lockdown-rules-beer
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 84rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Atheist. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It is not the remit of PCCs to investigate live crimes. They are there to oversee the police, that they are serving the public properly, reaching their targets and are value for money.
They do not determine investigations or decide who is or isn’t prosecuted. That is conspiracy theory nonsense.
tomus. the evidence hasn't been covered up - but we all know how conspiracy theories work - Starmer included.
Haha!!! Nothing to do with her then, Gromit. Okay. :o))
Nearly all PCCs are aligned to a political party. But they do an entirely different job than get involved in investigations. The Police force wouldn’t allow her to interfere, and she wouldn’t do because of obvious bias.

Unless you have any specific evidence that she did interfere with the investigation, then your allegation is pure fantasy.
You seem to find it suspicious that Durham has appointed a Deputy PCC as it never had one before.
The Home Office mandated them do so.

// As part of the PCC Review earlier this year The Home Office brought forward legislation to mandate PCCs to appoint a Deputy PCC. Nigel Bryson was selected as the preferred candidate by PCC Joy Allen and his appointment was reviewed at a Special Police and Crime Panel meeting held earlier today. //
Starmer and m/s Rayner had the decency to offer their resignations if found guilty. Boris is guilty and still hasn't gone and he ain't going to unless he is physically booted out of the door of No 10 into that Pickfords van.
//Starmer and m/s Rayner had the decency to offer their resignations if found guilty//

Only if found guilty ... not something they demanded of Boris. They demanded his departure solely on suspicion. Nothing 'decent' about that.
naomi24
//It will be accepted by those content with nepotism and lies.//

You ignored the nepotism pointed out yesterday too.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nadine-dorries-complains-bbc-nepotism-25136819.amp

As for the lies, remind me again who has just resigned over a pack of them?
FatticusInch, I didn't ignore that - I didn't see it. As far as I'm aware quite a few MPs employ family members. Was it pursued and if so what was the result?
naomi24
//Starmer and m/s Rayner had the decency to offer their resignations if found guilty//

/Only if found guilty ... not something they demanded of Boris. They demanded his departure solely on suspicion. Nothing 'decent' about that./

I reckon they were going more on ‘form’ and ‘previous’, he does after all have a propensity for such behaviour.
The Pincher scandal is proof.
You really MUST stop defending the indefensible, it makes you look as guilty and complicit as your hero.
He now looks rather silly and devoid of any argument too.
FatticusInch, what you 'reckon' is irrelevant.
naomi24
//FatticusInch, I didn't ignore that - I didn't see it. //

Ah, the Johnson Defence when found out! PMSL
You must spend a fortune on incontinence pads. Could you answer my question please. Was it pursued and if so, what was the result?
naomi24
//You must spend a fortune on incontinence pads. Could you answer my question please.//

You never answer any of mine so why should I reciprocate?
As I asked yesterday, tell my why Johnson met Lebedev alone in Italy directly after a NATO summit? How come he conveniently forgot, again? You didn’t even offer a reasonable explanation as to why, just disappeared as per.
But do carry on, you’re taking blind loyalty and foolishness to a whole new level.
The Tories got rid of Johnson because they’d finally had enough of all the lies, get used to that.
09,17 "They demanded his departure soley on suspicion" What planet are you living on Naomi ,
haven't you paid your TV licence.
Haha! Oh dear ...

I don't know why Boris met him in Italy.

Your turn.
Gulliver, They were demanding his resignation long before a fine was issued. Come on now - even you must know that.
naomi24
//You must spend a fortune on incontinence pads. Could you answer my question please. Was it pursued and if so, what was the result?//

No, Dorries didn’t pursue it, I guess it was pointed out to her she’d made a colossal mistake and huge faux pas and the BBC never heard from her about the matter again, as far as I’m aware.
Everyone happy then. Jolly good.

21 to 40 of 84rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Starmer And Rayner Cleared. Will This Be Accepted By Right Wing Abers?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.