New Judge, I am well aware of the absurdity of asking a male patient if he is pregnant. When asked he has a few possible options - answer no, give a light hearted response as suggested earlier in this thread or feel insulted and cause a furore which doesn't help anyone. My choice would be to save my ire for something important and take one of the first two of those options.
With regard to the hospital rape, I have outlined a scenario in which the hospital administration could have been unaware that there was a male in the female ward. That is a consequence of rules which allow someone to self identify as female or male when they are not physically so. If the rules are changed to, for example, only permit trans women who have had a sex change operation and are now legally female to be put in a female ward, it creates a different issue.
Suppose I was born male but have changed sex - to all outward appearances I am female, just without ovaries or a uterus. I have not yet changed my sex legally, so my official documentation all indicates that I am male. With that rule the hospital would have to put me on a male ward despite my external appearance. The same question would also apply were I born female and have transitioned to male, complete with penis, bit had not changed my legal sex.
None of what I have said willl change anybodys mind, nor do I think it will make them consider their own attitude to the whole biological sex/gender issue. It isn't an issue which will go away anytime in the near future, nor it as one contributer to AB might put it "woke cobras". The split between bilogical sex and percieved gender was raised sometime in the 1940's if mempory serves, further work was don on it in the 50's, 60's, 70's and later, and these days it's becoming political, so I will do my level best to keep out of it in the future.