You're at it again, Corby, and your constant stirring isn't helpful. Unlike the contributor who just joined us again and, once again, is no more, TTT is not a troll.
I must remember to refer to Sunak as "wee". Despite being male he's only three or so inches taller than Sturgeon, so I guess he's entitled to the same petite description.
If Indyref2 IS eventually allowed the result should be enacted. If it is merely "advisory & consultative" that would encourage a Leave vote simply as another stick to beat Westminster with.
No doubt it will be reconsidered again after a generation from the previous one. (Provided the Scots still insist on having an anti-union party in the majority.)
You're at it again, Corby, and your constant stirring isn't helpful. Unlike the contributor who just joined us again and, once again, is no more, TTT is not a troll.
Not before things have settled down. Knee jerk reaction to change encourages decisions that may be regretted later.
Besides no one should want to support the EU trick of continually asking the same question until it gets the answer it was looking for, then not asking it ever again.
As I have said before, there could be votes every seven year on Ulster leaving the UK, if need be.
Why then, should that principal not apply to Scotland, especially as the previous vote was eighteen month before the Tories campaigned in a General Election promising a Brexit vote?
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.