2024 Caboodle National Books Puzzle
Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Squeezing The Last Drop?
89 Answers
Is this really neccessary, an admin teenager tried nearly eighty years on?
https:/
https:/
Answers
Like others, I feel that this lady, when a girl, didn't really have a choice. She was a typist. Had she refused to work or protested - her life would probably have been forfeit. Other Germans who were not Nazis had to keep the country running - postmen, bus-drivers etc.. Are they also guilty of something in helping the regime to exist? There was nothing in her...
18:19 Tue 20th Dec 2022
Quite ridiculous Dougie, but then we do seem to like a good witch-hunt these days.
It makes me think of Traudl Junge, Hitler's last private secretary.
Imprisoned post-war and badly treated, but eventually allowed to live in the old West Germany.
She went on to make a couple of documentaries for ITV, and get on with the rest of her life.
And, honestly... why not?
It makes me think of Traudl Junge, Hitler's last private secretary.
Imprisoned post-war and badly treated, but eventually allowed to live in the old West Germany.
She went on to make a couple of documentaries for ITV, and get on with the rest of her life.
And, honestly... why not?
Saying 'It was a long time ago ...' or 'She had no influence...' is not the point.
You can't start examining each case on its 'merits' because no system of justice can operate effectively under such a system.
That means we hold no-one responsible, which is no system at all, or we hold everyone responsible, so excuses, then everyone has the same system of justice.
That is why this woman was brought to trial, and convicted.
Everyone equal, no exceptions.
That is the way justice works, because it's the only way it works.
You can't start examining each case on its 'merits' because no system of justice can operate effectively under such a system.
That means we hold no-one responsible, which is no system at all, or we hold everyone responsible, so excuses, then everyone has the same system of justice.
That is why this woman was brought to trial, and convicted.
Everyone equal, no exceptions.
That is the way justice works, because it's the only way it works.
Yes. Otherwise someone can calculate an age beyond which crime doesn't matter.
If you are alive, you can be brought to justice.
O god I will choose this one to ridicule and refute. because of the statute of Limitations - version 0? 1604 I think. 400 y ago give or take a drink or two, they time limited cases,
except....
Murder ( at common law: but remember there is a limitation - you had to die within a year and a day from the injury)
and historically - Sex abuse ( under the 'new' 2003 act)(*)
and Furchner was convicted of aiding or abetting ( and or complicity)
complicity isnt really a word used in English Criminal Law.
And so you can now see reader, the answer : " Yes.Evil must always be punished." is only true if you tack on: within the current Statute of Limitations.
(*) and of course the 1994 War Crimes Act - which allowed war crimes elsewhere to be indicted tried here. Loud squawking from their lordships ( the Law Lords silly!) as it criminalised activities ( war crimes on foreign soil) which had not previously been a crime.
( what you did in 1943 was OK but now it isnt).
AND
You can't start examining each case on its 'merits' because no system of justice.....
o god this statement is so dumbhead I should ask a mod to delete it. Oh. It was written by a mod. That is why it is still here.
Each case is of course tried on its merits - it is a called a C-O-U-R-T C-A-S-E, and a jury makes a verdict. And yes bringing a case it judged on its merits, this is called a 'charging decision' by the CPS
You can't start examining each case on its 'merits' can be refuted by: each case is judged on its 'merits' in at least two points ( charging and jury trial).
In this case they cd reasonably have found that it was not in the public interest to continue
phew - English Law only
If you are alive, you can be brought to justice.
O god I will choose this one to ridicule and refute. because of the statute of Limitations - version 0? 1604 I think. 400 y ago give or take a drink or two, they time limited cases,
except....
Murder ( at common law: but remember there is a limitation - you had to die within a year and a day from the injury)
and historically - Sex abuse ( under the 'new' 2003 act)(*)
and Furchner was convicted of aiding or abetting ( and or complicity)
complicity isnt really a word used in English Criminal Law.
And so you can now see reader, the answer : " Yes.Evil must always be punished." is only true if you tack on: within the current Statute of Limitations.
(*) and of course the 1994 War Crimes Act - which allowed war crimes elsewhere to be indicted tried here. Loud squawking from their lordships ( the Law Lords silly!) as it criminalised activities ( war crimes on foreign soil) which had not previously been a crime.
( what you did in 1943 was OK but now it isnt).
AND
You can't start examining each case on its 'merits' because no system of justice.....
o god this statement is so dumbhead I should ask a mod to delete it. Oh. It was written by a mod. That is why it is still here.
Each case is of course tried on its merits - it is a called a C-O-U-R-T C-A-S-E, and a jury makes a verdict. And yes bringing a case it judged on its merits, this is called a 'charging decision' by the CPS
You can't start examining each case on its 'merits' can be refuted by: each case is judged on its 'merits' in at least two points ( charging and jury trial).
In this case they cd reasonably have found that it was not in the public interest to continue
phew - English Law only
eighty years on
it is very difficult to decide what was going on
65 000 dead is very low, and initially the SS were getting rid of the Polish intelligentsia. Remember that 25% of Poland end up dead by 1945.
Polish POW, civilian Interns, usually they werent mixed and matched. Subcamp at Thorn ( torun) where my father as and he was deffo a British POW - and THEY werent mixed and matched ( until the chaos of early 1945)
https:/
it is very difficult to decide what was going on
65 000 dead is very low, and initially the SS were getting rid of the Polish intelligentsia. Remember that 25% of Poland end up dead by 1945.
Polish POW, civilian Interns, usually they werent mixed and matched. Subcamp at Thorn ( torun) where my father as and he was deffo a British POW - and THEY werent mixed and matched ( until the chaos of early 1945)
https:/
Closure. Relief for so many.
I used to lunch with an elderly Jewish lady (not really that old but worn) and she was guilt ridden for having survived a camp when so many - including her family had not. She is dead for a while now but this would have meant so much to her.
Also to other people I can think of.
I used to lunch with an elderly Jewish lady (not really that old but worn) and she was guilt ridden for having survived a camp when so many - including her family had not. She is dead for a while now but this would have meant so much to her.
Also to other people I can think of.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank14 mins ago
ChatterBank18 mins ago
Trump's Cabinet Picks. What Do We Think?
News18 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.