News2 mins ago
'Woman' Rapes Two Women Using 'Her' Penis And Is Sent To A Woman's Jail.
https:/
Jesus wept - who agrees this is absurd?
And why the hell is the Mail referring to somebody with a penis who rapes women as 'her'?
In his most recent Netflix special, Ricky Gervais had a routine about this very scenario, which was hilarious because it was so absurd. Paraphrasing "He raped me", "you mean she raped you", "but he had a penis", "she had a penis you effing bigot". But clearly it wasn't that absurd after all!
Jesus wept - who agrees this is absurd?
And why the hell is the Mail referring to somebody with a penis who rapes women as 'her'?
In his most recent Netflix special, Ricky Gervais had a routine about this very scenario, which was hilarious because it was so absurd. Paraphrasing "He raped me", "you mean she raped you", "but he had a penis", "she had a penis you effing bigot". But clearly it wasn't that absurd after all!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Deskdiary. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
ymb // And that Khandro is what people like Zebru cant seem to understand. //
Understand this. I never did and never will support the Sturgeon bill.
Understand also, I shall not remain silent and let OPs attempt to undermine the right of a person who wishes to change gender, all because of ONE transwoman rapist.
Those who claim to really care for the safety of women, ought to be more vociferous about the abuse and violence they have to put up with on a much grander scale, which is by and large down to the despicable actions of heterosexual men.
Understand this. I never did and never will support the Sturgeon bill.
Understand also, I shall not remain silent and let OPs attempt to undermine the right of a person who wishes to change gender, all because of ONE transwoman rapist.
Those who claim to really care for the safety of women, ought to be more vociferous about the abuse and violence they have to put up with on a much grander scale, which is by and large down to the despicable actions of heterosexual men.
Untitled, really surprised nobody has posted one of these yet...
https:/
https:/
TTT // "because 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers"
You missed off the rest of the sentence: //
The rest of the sentence that followed was irrelevant.
This is the way it works.
Poster declares in a statement;
// 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers //
Subsequently when challenged, poster substantiates their claim.
So let’s start again.
What are your medical qualifications?
You missed off the rest of the sentence: //
The rest of the sentence that followed was irrelevant.
This is the way it works.
Poster declares in a statement;
// 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers //
Subsequently when challenged, poster substantiates their claim.
So let’s start again.
What are your medical qualifications?
NJ // I’ve no intention of addressing them or referring to them by their “preferred pronouns.” I will not take part in such a charade. //
Then just like this chap, Dr David Mackereth, were you to be in someone’s employ, potentially you too, would be at the wrong end of a lawsuit.
Mackereth v Department of Work and Pensions & Advanced Personnel Management Group (UK) Limited [2022] EAT 99 - Old Square Chambers
FYI, continually refusing to use their preferred pronouns which leads to a trans-person feeling ill at ease is tantamount to harassment.
Then just like this chap, Dr David Mackereth, were you to be in someone’s employ, potentially you too, would be at the wrong end of a lawsuit.
Mackereth v Department of Work and Pensions & Advanced Personnel Management Group (UK) Limited [2022] EAT 99 - Old Square Chambers
FYI, continually refusing to use their preferred pronouns which leads to a trans-person feeling ill at ease is tantamount to harassment.
zebu: "TTT // "because 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers"
You missed off the rest of the sentence: // The rest of the sentence that followed was irrelevant. " - no it was not, it clarifies the sentence:
"because 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers at best or opportunists at worst, taking advantage of a gullible simple minded fools that go along with this old pony. "
You missed off the rest of the sentence: // The rest of the sentence that followed was irrelevant. " - no it was not, it clarifies the sentence:
"because 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers at best or opportunists at worst, taking advantage of a gullible simple minded fools that go along with this old pony. "
NJ // the term “gender” having been rendered largely meaningless, principally as a result of this nonsense, //
Only in the eyes of the ignorant and those who cannot bear for one second, the thought that someone may differ from their own heterosexual stereotype.
Regrettably this thread serves to highlight those OPs who side with you :-(
Only in the eyes of the ignorant and those who cannot bear for one second, the thought that someone may differ from their own heterosexual stereotype.
Regrettably this thread serves to highlight those OPs who side with you :-(
// zebu: "TTT // "because 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers"
You missed off the rest of the sentence: // The rest of the sentence that followed was irrelevant. " - no it was not, it clarifies the sentence:
"because 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers at best or opportunists at worst, taking advantage of a gullible simple minded fools that go along with this old pony. " //
Again... what are your medical qualifications to assert that
// 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers at best //
??
You missed off the rest of the sentence: // The rest of the sentence that followed was irrelevant. " - no it was not, it clarifies the sentence:
"because 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers at best or opportunists at worst, taking advantage of a gullible simple minded fools that go along with this old pony. " //
Again... what are your medical qualifications to assert that
// 99.9% of the time they are attention seekers at best //
??
Zebu, nobody has ever cared about gender- we segregate by biological sex only- and those reasons haven't changed. Transgender males- are no more, and no less, likely to commit a crime, than any other male. You may think you are sounding "tolerant" and right on... because you clearly haven't thought it through.
As far as "medical qualifications"- nobody needs any, to know that humans cannot change sex.
As far as "medical qualifications"- nobody needs any, to know that humans cannot change sex.
Latest Posts
News3 mins ago
Why Is The "Police Watchdog...
News11 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles15 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.