Editor's Blog2 mins ago
Sue Gray's Labour Activist Son
Sue Gray was last night facing fresh questions about alleged bias as pictures of her son, Liam Conlon, standing alongside Sir Keir Starmer emerged – including one taken during her Partygate probe.
The pictures reignited the ‘impartiality’ row engulfing the former top civil servant after she quit her Whitehall role last week to become Sir Keir’s chief of staff.
Liam Conlon is chair of the Labour Party Irish Society, and has recently campaigned for Labour candidate Danny Beales in Boris Johnson’s Uxbridge seat in west London.
Meanwhile, Sue Gray, reportedly a friend of Keir Starmer since his time as Director of Public Prosecutions, still hasn't said when conversations with Starmer regarding her new appointment began, a question Starmer has also avoided answering.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-1 1823795 /Tory-f ury-Sue -Grays- activis t-son-p ictured -posing -Sir-Ke ir-Star mer.htm l
The plot thickens…. and it's a stinky one.
The pictures reignited the ‘impartiality’ row engulfing the former top civil servant after she quit her Whitehall role last week to become Sir Keir’s chief of staff.
Liam Conlon is chair of the Labour Party Irish Society, and has recently campaigned for Labour candidate Danny Beales in Boris Johnson’s Uxbridge seat in west London.
Meanwhile, Sue Gray, reportedly a friend of Keir Starmer since his time as Director of Public Prosecutions, still hasn't said when conversations with Starmer regarding her new appointment began, a question Starmer has also avoided answering.
https:/
The plot thickens…. and it's a stinky one.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Sue Gray’s report was mostly irrelevant, and was published after the police had investigated 16 parties and concluded they broke covid rules at the time.
Claims of bias and that the report was wrong are clearly made by desperate Johnson supporters who have conveniently forgotten that the police fined 83 people, including the Prime Minister and his wife.
Claims of bias and that the report was wrong are clearly made by desperate Johnson supporters who have conveniently forgotten that the police fined 83 people, including the Prime Minister and his wife.
'A spokesperson for the privileges committee dismissed Johnson’s arguments, saying the findings were “not based on the Sue Gray report” but on witness accounts and evidence supplied by the government.'
Do you think the police relied upon only the information provided to Sue Gray or did they have additional information?
Do you think the police relied upon only the information provided to Sue Gray or did they have additional information?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.