https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-65248924
....on what legal basis are the police allowed to remove property? It cannot be merely that it causes offence. Well if it is, is it enough that I call the police over anything I am offended by and they'll remove it?
This is a lefty liberal site with over censure and run for the minority clique, that is why it has never succeeded and grown like other Q&A sites. People are driven away by that sort of thing.
disagreement is what this site is all about Anne
I note no one has thought the intelligence leak in the US was worth a thread - others may er diagree.
I thought naughty TTT might have added a goobiwog as an avatar
and the spare ed had snatched the soft toy out of his pram - to the predictable squawks. -
It doesn't matter if anyone was offended, Deskdiary. Read the article provided in the original post. You'll find that they are regarded as racist caricatures and due to the controversy, we won't allow members to use them as their avatars.
I don't think our request is unreasonable, particularly as there is a pub undergoing investigation for having "golliwog dolls" displayed.
"The toy is now widely regarded as a racially offensive caricature. The doll's clothing is based on the typical outfit worn by minstrel show performers."
Regardless of the origin of the word or whether a different form of the word were used, the doll itself is racist and offensive.
You say that as a statement of fact, Corby, but like, anything else it’s only offensive if you’re offended by it. Personality, like a lot of other things that appear to cause offence to some people, I think it’s ridiculous.