Boris Would Have Been Suspended...

[choux]

for 90 days had he not resigned. tbh, I am not surprised but it is a mucky game in politics and there will be more dirt-throwing, no doubt. The world still spins ;)

[naomi24]

True, OG. ClareTG0ld is aware of the reason I won’t enter into discussion on topics such as this. The ‘goaders’ may not be - but it’s none of their business anyway so I can live with that.

[naomi24]

Just to clarify, my post at 13.04 to zacs-master.

[Untitled]

"Faced with something that cuts away one's argument, either misinterpret it to make out it's wrong, or simply ignore it and continually to repeat one's flawed argument in the hope of convincing."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

[Untitled]

"ClareTG0ld is aware of the reason I won’t enter into discussion on topics such as this. "

i don't know why you keep replying and insist on having the last word if you refuse to enter a discussion on this topic... it is very odd behaviour.

clare has obliterated your argument anyway as any reader who is actually interested in the truth will be able to tell

[Peter Pedant]

Just to clarify, my post at 13.04 to zacs-master.
I love clarifications
you start with standard AB guff
clarify it
and sell it onto Mystic Meg - simples!

[Peter Pedant]

yikes ! psych projection is a bit - heavy
but worth a read for those tiring of AB lite

[Peter Pedant]

"True, OG. ClareTG0ld is aware of the reason I won’t enter into discussion on topics such as this. "

says an ABer er entering into the discussion....
doesnt any one notice the contradiction ? which defies clarification ( as you just get another contradiction)

[Peter Pedant]

Hymie and I were not talking about the report - which is why I recommended you read the other posts.

no keep away from the posts - alot are nonsense
read the report

[Peter Pedant]

and if you read the report then you would know that its contents are germane to your discussion

untitled scores again ! andno one listens. Yes I agree alot of the points here are exhaustively discussed in the report....

[naomi24]

Untitled, ahh, you need it spelt out to you. Ok, I have patience. I do not enter into discussion on topics such as this with ClareTG0ld - and ClareTG0ld knows why.

[Peter Pedant]

you need it spelt out to you: its a secret!
o god this has to be AB - there is no other site possible

[Untitled]

how convenient!

[naomi24]

Untitled, even though you have no idea what you’re talking about you are entitled to your opinion. I can live with that too. :o)

[Untitled]

thank you naomi i will continue to express it….

it is awfully convenient indeed that you “don’t enter into discussion” with a person who has shown very convincingly that your criticisms of the committee are incorrect….

i would also opine that you are not really in a position to criticise anyone whom you feel is speaking from ignorance because you pointedly refuse to actually read or comment on any of the evidence that johnson deliberately misled the house as is laid out here:


https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/40412/documents/197199/default/

instead you dishonestly spout theories that are half baked and poorly informed… and look rather silly and deceitful doing it

[Peter Pedant]

I have a secret, and if I tell you, it wont be secret anymore !
Jesus - a bit school yardie,
but hey this is AB on satturday !

who was it who complained: PP you treat us (wise beyond their years ABer) like morons
yes I do...

anyway Pannick and Pobjoy I kicks off with - "we know it is a ctee and so is not justiciable ( cant be dragged into court)
but if it were , then a JR ( judicial review) would show....."

rather than - parliamentary ctees are independent of the judiciary since long long ago 1689, and can do the hell they like.....and we know all that

[Peter Pedant]

I still think she hasnt read it you know
OK
shows no outsidee evidence of having read it....

[Gromit]

A missed opportunity for Boris. He could have written a book in 90 days.
The rest of us dodged a bullet :-)

[naomi24]

Untitled, If you want to have a discussion please conduct it like an adult. I have no reason to lie, I am not on trial here and, like anyone else, I am not obliged to respond to posts or to give explanations to those my decisions don’t concern. Now please stop being rude.

[Peter Pedant]

can we er get back to whether boris would have been suspended please.
too much - I object to this and I object to that
and far too much of " I cd tell you, but I am a laydee, so I wont"

Boris has gone un-naturally quiet today
is it "I will only speak if you pay me" - how unexpected !

[Peter Pedant]

I have no reason to lie,
neither did Boris
but he did ! hur hur hur.

I am always suspicious of " I have no reason to do X"
instead of a straightforward " I did not do X"

inured by Boris' prevaricating