Could All Help With Signing My Petition
Seasonal0 min ago
Not Enough
25 Answers
Cruel mother and her 'sadistic' career criminal boyfriend who starved the nine-year-old, forced him to stand outside for hours and held little boy down in cold baths are jailed for 27 and 32 years.
Should hang.
https:/
Should hang.
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
And another one: 12 years for stabbing with a knife and bragging after. Pathetic justice system.
https:/
https:/
Another perverse decision and let down again of our so called justice system. Where do they dig these morons up on the Parole Boards .
https:/
https:/
//but has it always been like this and we've just never heard about it until recently?//
Sadly yes although in the 'old days' people were stopped from doing it again, either by swinging or locked up for life.
It is ludicrous we can even contemplate such evil being allowed to roam free on our streets ever again. But that is what is likely to happen here as they are not old.
If the liberals cant take capital punishment then whole life with no parole has to be done.
//Where is the deterrent?//
In these cases I dont think anything would be a deterrent. I want rid of them so there is no risk of them doing it again. Take a life in this manor forfeit your own.
Sadly yes although in the 'old days' people were stopped from doing it again, either by swinging or locked up for life.
It is ludicrous we can even contemplate such evil being allowed to roam free on our streets ever again. But that is what is likely to happen here as they are not old.
If the liberals cant take capital punishment then whole life with no parole has to be done.
//Where is the deterrent?//
In these cases I dont think anything would be a deterrent. I want rid of them so there is no risk of them doing it again. Take a life in this manor forfeit your own.
These 2 sentences are announced on the same day that we learn Colin Pitchfork is safe to be freed. Really? A convicted rapist and murderer of 2 girls? I cannot agree with your post, JimF but even if I did I ask again - where is the deterrent?
https:/
"The panel noted that Mr Pitchfork has been in prison for a very long time. His behaviour for almost all of that time has not caused any concern... and the evidence before the panel demonstrated that he had learnt the lessons that he had been taught and had worked out how to apply them in practice."
https:/
"The panel noted that Mr Pitchfork has been in prison for a very long time. His behaviour for almost all of that time has not caused any concern... and the evidence before the panel demonstrated that he had learnt the lessons that he had been taught and had worked out how to apply them in practice."
// I remember this case,choux.Wasnt it the first time DNA was used to get a murderous bastrad behind bars? And he tried to incriminate his friends and relations to avoid justice. //
when Leicestershire Police announced the mass testing of males in the area, he persuaded a work colleague to take the test on his behalf, so as to avoid (as he put it) scrutiny by the police in view of previous convictions. that colleague drunkenly disclosed that to friends, and one of them reported the matter.
DNA fingerprinting first came to attention in this case; it definitely ruled out the police's no1 suspect, and although it provided proof positive of Pitchfork's guilt, it wasn't necessary for that evidence to be used in his conviction, as he pleaded guilty.
when Leicestershire Police announced the mass testing of males in the area, he persuaded a work colleague to take the test on his behalf, so as to avoid (as he put it) scrutiny by the police in view of previous convictions. that colleague drunkenly disclosed that to friends, and one of them reported the matter.
DNA fingerprinting first came to attention in this case; it definitely ruled out the police's no1 suspect, and although it provided proof positive of Pitchfork's guilt, it wasn't necessary for that evidence to be used in his conviction, as he pleaded guilty.
