Shopping & Style1 min ago
Nothing To See Here
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by douglas9401. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Something to see here
https:/
"Resisting calls to resign, Mr Matheson admitted that the issue "could have been dealt with better" but said his initial denial that anyone else had used the device was a "genuine attempt" to try to shield his family"
So it wasn't a case of him not realising his sons had used the ipad, it was a deliberate lie to cover it up. No doubt he has been told the outcome of the investigation and has jumped before he was pushed.
"my conclusions, as advised, are drawn from the actions of the minister, as reported.
my conclusions, as advised, are drawn from the actions of the minister, as reported.
I'm not sure why an 'investigation' is required."
Is everything you read or hear in the media correct?
If allegations are disputed, how would the facts be established without being investigated?
Corby - By no means is everything in the media correct, nor did I infer that it is.
The ex-minister does not appear to dispute the facts as reported - if he had, he would still be the minister, protesting is innocence, and suing any media outlet maligning his reputation.
None of that has happened.
He has paid back the money he falsely claimed, and resigned.
I see no need for an investigation, but I am sure the reasons will be made clear.
I would suggest, with high confidence, that any investigation is not going to find that the minister has been maligned in any way, or that his resignation was not necessary or appropriate.
The electorate are a bit funny about their representatives cheating them, and lying about it, they're just old-fashioned that way.