ChatterBank4 mins ago
I Wondered When Labour Would Get Around To This.....
We know they are riddled with anti semites so hardy surprising they want to defend their "freedom fighter" buddies.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.it doesn't though. israel poured money into hamas to stop gaza from unifying with the palestian authority and fired upon peaceful protestors in gaza. the IDF have been committing massacres of civilians in Gaza since at least 1956 long before hamas was founded. the uk should not be supplying weapons to governments or organisations which will use them to kill children. i am not a big fan of starmer but i agree with this entirely.
stop it with the BS untitled, yes there is history, this latest chapter started on Oct 7th. Any collateral deaths are at the feet of Hamas. The cowards insist on using hospitals and schools for bases and weapons storage so that is a lot of the collateral but even for the rest they are victims of Hamas' barabarity on Oct 7th. End of.
"Untitled where is your proof of your accusations."
the specific ones i mentioned?
khan younis massacre, november 1956
march of return, 2018-2019
naomi
in this link you can see footage of a palestinian man in gaza holding up a child whose head has been destroyed during an IDF airstrike on a civilian area.
plenty of other examples too
israel was perfectly capable of conducting a targeted assassination in the middle of tehran with zero civilian casualties toratoratora. what you call "collateral damage" is simply people the IDF doesn't care about killing. in fact some whistleblowers have alleged that they are quite keen on it and the south african legal case also presents some compelling evidence of that too. israel's goal in gaza is to depopulate it and replace them with jewish colonies.
and therefore what naomi? israel can do whatever it likes? it can drop UK-supplied bombs on civilian camps, kill as many children as it needs to? rape and torture prisoners? block the majority of food supplies and attack starving people when they flock to the remainder? kill children in lebanon?
to justify means "to show to be right or reasonable". i do not think that the hamas attacks on october 7th was either of those things and i do not support hamas. you do however seem to think that Israel's behaviour is. i am pleased to say i do not share your enthusiasm for the things i mention above?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.