Mortimer And Whitehouse Gone Christmas...
Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Hurrah - justice has been served (although I'd like to have seen these cretinous deluded morons receive more), but I'm reasonably happy with 12 years.
Q - did anybody see on the news last night their idiotic justification for stealing the remains of that poor woman? As there were a few guinea pig bones in the woods she was fair game.
It just simply beggars belief that in their weird screwed up little world they equate defiling a human grave on a par with the remains of a few rodents.
As mentioned in a previous post, and despite the opinion that certain people has posted as evidence, the fact remains that humans are significantly more important than animals, and if the death of a million or even 10 million animals leads to the successful treatment of a disease, then the end justifies the means.
No best answer has yet been selected by flip-flop. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Can't believe I'm doing this, but what they hey - to answer some of your, really quite breathtakingly stupid points, are you really that naive to think that scientists test drugs on animals for fun? Are you really that half witted?
I don't think animals should be killed for sport, but I am happy to wear animal skins if it is a by-product (do you wear leather shoes?).
I do have a wax jacket, which i wear in the winter when I'm walking my dogs.
I despise 4x4s - I think they are pointless vehicles, unless they are used for what they were designed for.
However, I am mature and pragmatic enough to realise there is a natural pecking order which we are at the top of, and that testing drugs on animals is for our benefit and should continue.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.