Softly, softly Police

[anotheoldgit]

Why were there no arrests made, over this incident? And why was this not given wide TV coverage? Is it not time Burkas were banned once and for all?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles /news/news.html?in_article_id=469285&in_page_i d=1770

[fiest82]

roman, I've read your earlier posts and I hink you have issues (racist ones) so seek some help, my friend.

I don't support these people at all but because I do support the freedom of spech which they have practised here. In a wrong way of course but at least its a freedom I'd rather have than not

[NJOK]

I've got a couple of ideas.

Firstly, I strongly suggest that people think long and hard about how immediate and real the threat of terrorism is. I suggest it's massively overblown. For a bit of food for thought, watch the award-winning series of documentary films The Power of Nightmares. Remember, it's in the interests of both politicians and the media to over-(not under-)state the level of terror we face.

Secondly, have a go at chilling out a bit. I've lived in London for about 10 years and there have only been two times that I've felt unsafe - although this is subjective.

In second place comes 7/7 when our tubes and buses were bombed. In first place was April 1999, when for three weeks, a white man let his hatred and fear of minorities consume him to the extent that he launched a series of nail bomb attacks across London. Let's not follow his lead eh?

[fiest82]

Alright, roman moron (is that better?), firstly saying that moderate muslims will side with extremists when given the cahnce. That is total bullsh1t. Get out more and maybe then you'll have a better idea of what's going on.

[fiest82]

And please don't shout my name, its NOT in capslock as you can see.

[fiest82]

raghead roman, if you can be racist then I can be equally unfair.

Here is your pathetic post:

AGGY ROMAN
Tue 24/07/07
10:19


NJOK - nothing to do with the fact that some Muslims want to blow us to kingdom come then? And please don't go on about the "moderate Muslims" - who are so always absent in their comdemnation. Whose side do you think they would take if push came to shove, ours or the extemists?

A fairly rhetorical question in my opinion...
Now shove off if you dont want to discuss it further and dont type 2 posts in a row like some desperate thug eager for a fight.

[fiest82]

Oh wait, let me copy you roman loser ....

can you see now, how pathetic it looks!!

[NJOK]

On the contrary, Raggy. Recent events have gone a long way to putting my mind at rest.

Far from appearing to be the work of a homogenous well-drilled military force, the recent attacks were unbelievably amateur. They set fire to a jeep and drove it into a door for goodness sake.

[fiest82]

In my opinion, after reading a lot of your earlier rubbish posts, I have reasonably concluded that you are infact a racist and will never change.

I dont care if you are not happy, it is not my duty to make sure my posts cheer you up for Gods sake, now think before you type up any more infantile rants, in future.

[China Doll]

There is a sense that the terrorists are not quite the elite force we've been led to believe. Perhaps they were trained by the elite republican guard found in IRAQ during the first war there.

[NJOK]

Most respected scholars of Islamism agree that Al-Qaeda doesn't have a network of 'cells'. It has no organisational structure and no hierarchy. Islamists radical approach Bin Laden on an ad hoc basis and ask him for money.

It was only 'given' a structure by the US authorities because, in order to prosecute Bin Laden using laws created to bring down the mafia, they needed to paint him as the head of an organised body with a prosecutable chain of command between him and the US embassy bombers.

Sorry but this axis of evil reminds me of when the US government tried to suggest that most terrorist organisations - from the IRA to the PLO - were part of a Soviet terror network, because the defence secretary had read about it in a book.

When he asked the CIA to prepare a dossier on the subject, they told him they couldn't. Because it was utterly false.

When he pointed to the evidence in the book he'd read, they told him that they knew it to be untrue, because they were the ones who had made it up. After he'd ask them to.

Ah, the wheels of government.

[fiest82]

I'll sue you and another Aber (in another category) for ''pathetic''
(I used it first) and you can sue me for ''infantile'' in turn (a crap word anyhow).

I hate imitators myself, I am fairly sure I have a stalker in another category....

[NJOK]

And that brings up the 100.

Good night!