Donate SIGN UP

Maddie x

Avatar Image
PatriciaH | 18:35 Wed 26th Sep 2007 | News
61 Answers
Just been on the 6 oclock news that the little girl in the paper abroad is not her .... sad news..
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 61rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by PatriciaH. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Hopefully yes Monkey.

No one else is to blame apart from them and i hope that it is on their conscience for the rest of their days. Dont say that whoever took maddie is to blame because there is no evidence.
Is that the beginning and end of your argument, Rev ?

I had thought better of you..........apologies.

monkey.

I can understand why you see them as innocent being a religious freak yourself

Don't try to convert others.

Religion is the biggest pile of Bollox ever

And to many people ''HIDE'' behind religion.

Mc Canns included
Hang on Laurence, that was a cheap nasty shot. Monkeyeyes may be religious, but that is not the issue in question here and in no way does that make him or her a freak.

That was nasty, even by your standards.
OK, laurence, I'll type this slowly because you are clearly hard of thinking.............

I am a committed athiest. I was putting myself in the shoes of the McCanns as they are committed catholics............

You have demonstrated many times that you are unable to see anyone elses viewpoint; happily it is not so with me.
Boo.

I'm sorry if i insulted monkey or anyone else about religion.

I've now ''SEEN THE LIGHT'' :}
hes just mad that he went all out and bought all the chelsea gear when that started getting good, and now there rubbish again he feels like a mug....

Hi Laurence x

lol

what else do you expect.......everyones a hardman on teh keyboard.....
You appear to have mis-apologised, Laurence.

You apologised to B00 after she correctly upbraided you.........but you seem to have neglected to apologise to ME.

I'm sure it's just an oversight.................
Well thank goodness for that Laurence, hopefully now you'll become a compassionate person ;-)
Oh god.

The russian dyke {eyebrows} is here


Well praise the lord brothers and sisters.

monkey.

likewise i'm afraid?
My no stretch of the imagination could anyone fail to see that the tiny girl in the photo was NOT Maddie - much fuller in the face for one thing. It's apparently not strange to see blonde haired children in Morocco but holidaymakers might think so. I think we all "see" Maddie whenever we are out - loads of lovely little girls dressed in pink who look just like her!
I'm sure you know what you wanted to say when you starting typing, laurence................but somewhere between your brain fingers and keyboard the message got a little scrambled..........am I to take it that that was a big mans apology ?
Would you like me to apologise to you monkey?
I am upset that this photo has been around for so long and only released now, it is as if Team Mc Cann hold stuff back from the papers so they can release it when the Mc Cann story goes quiet.

It is uncanny that within days of silence something is released or they make some form of 'statement'. I know they are doing it because they feel keeping Maddie in the papers will keep the search 'alive' but planning it all out like a stratigic tactical pursuit comes across very unnatural and as if they enjoy the lime light.

The whole story about Gerry's wallet being stolen in london with photos of Maddie inside, of which they hadn't got copies just sounded so fake. The story came out when there was a lull in the news coverage. They had limited photo's of Maddie when she went missing and had to ask family at home for photos they could use in the search for her, so why were there unused photos in his wallet, which he hadn't got copied to help in the search????

Well, it would be sensible to apologise to the person you insulted rather than the person who told you off, wouldn't it ?

I can try and put it in words of one syllable if that will help..........?
What...the ?

I can only refer you to the answer given by Gromit @ 10.37.
gromit mentions who was passed the picture but timescale is not mentioned, we are not to know how long the Mc Canns had the photo.

Also the Mc Cann's have been told by their legal team to 'not comment' on sighting and photo's for obvious reasons. To protect their clients 'the Mc Canns - if they jumped all the time when a new sighting came out it would be like 'look someone did take her there she is' and therefore make it look like they are constantly trying to prove aduction without evidence. Like shouting 'they've taken her' when the parents found Maddie missing, it just looks bad on their part, and makes it look like they are pushing the blame away from themselves.
Here is the timescale what..the?

"It is understood she had taken the photo in August but had only recently downloaded her photos.

She said she decided to hand the photo to police on Monday after reading of other recent possible sightings."


So the person who took the picture only handed it to the police on MONDAY. It hit the papers WEDNESDAY.

The McCanns never had the photo.
I still think that Robert Murat is involved in some way. Can't explain why, just a gut feeling about the man.
i think that when maddies mum went to check on her and found her missing that she was already dead and that the apartment had already been made to look like it was broken into..the father had apparantly been checking the room at intervals during the meal!!! he comes back to the table and said all is ok with the kids and everyone belives him...whats to say maddie was even there and not dead already!!!!

41 to 60 of 61rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Maddie x

Answer Question >>