The same bulletin on Radio 4 has another item, expressing concern over the number of pupils leaving school early, probably for arranged marriages.
What a rich irony, ha ha ha, it's 50 years too late mates, you can't bring back Britain, it's too far submerged under 'multi-cultural' political correctness.
If I were a teenager I would refuse to take part, I'm a republican, I don't see why I should cow-tow to someone who is in that position due to an accident of birth.
If anything they should propose a pledge of allegiance to the country, not the monarchy
Why are school leavers being singled out for this stupid unworkable and pointless exercise. If Lord Goldsmith thinks tis is good for 'social cohesion' (whatever that might be) then surely everybody must swear allegiance to the Saxe-Coburg clan.
If they tagged a bank holiday to it and called it 'Allegiance Day' then it would get the tabloids seal of approval and be unstoppable. Fun events to be performed for 'Brown Nose Day' could include:
� The burning of effigies of Mohamed Al Fayed on socially cohesive bonfires.
� Communal denunciation of w�ps, dag�s fuzzy wuzzys and all other non brits from a special tract prepare for the purpose by Phil the Greek.
� An annual edition of 'It's a Knockout' so Edward can prance around in tights without arousing suspicion.
� A proclaimation of British tolerance, and six months gulag for anyone who doesn't join in.
just a small point but a valid one........this is a monarchy. therefore, we are subjects and not citizens.
How could this idea really work....surely who you pledge any allegiance to is a matter of personal conscience and not something the government should be trying to brainwash people with.
As I stated in another thread, this government has completely lost its way!
I agree with 4GS. How can a loyal, republican minded individual be expected to swear an oath of allegiance to a monarch. I would rather see flags raised on all public buildings, including schools. If children see the flag raised every day, hopefully they will all come to accept it as theirs, regardless of their cultural background.
The office of, "Monarch," is no bad thing as long as the holder and immediate family keep quiet on politically sensitive issues.
I doubt if having a president would come any cheaper, and would be just as lavish, and there is the added benefit of the monarch being above politics.
Having said that, the Irish model has some merit, where the president is a figurehead, and real power lies with the prime minister, (Toisich? Towcheech? I give up!)
Actually, having a President is a lot more expensive. Plus the Queen actually brings in plenty of cash, also (through tourism and also royal estates paying up outweighs the money they cost).
I don't think we've ever had a civilian oath to the Queen (outside perhaps of MPs or civil servants). Why on earth should we start now?
quite right, 4GS. I can't see why people shouldn't swear allegiance to the country - but to the queen in person? Americans pledge allegiance to the flag and the country it represents, not to George W Bush. I have no particular hate for the monarchy, though if they went the way of the Romanovs I suppose I could cope, but to imagine the queen IS the country is just medieval piffle.
Well Kromovaracun If we're deciding our constitutional arrangements on a financial basis we could make it cheaper still by getting the queen sponsored.
The Crown could be in the form of the McDonalds logo!
Or maybe we should just decide based on what's best and most forward looking for the country as a whole!