And you've STILL avoided answering my question. When more kids are injured or murdered, will you, with your soft approach and excuses, be happy to accept your share of the blame?
This is a nonsensical question - you start of with the premise of 'when'. You are stating that this won't work and you cannot possibly know that.
This from the Telegraph, July 2008 - At present, one in five people found guilty of a knife offence are let off with a caution. - so 80% are presumably charged. Do you know why they were cautioned? Presumably because the police think that is the best course of action in that case. Interesting that although you have no knowledge of these cases, you appear to think you know better than the police.
The Spectator, May 2008 - In 2006, only nine of the 6,314 people convicted of carrying a knife were handed down a maximum sentence. - this is fairly normal - the maximum sentence for robbery is life imprisonment. The maximum for burglary is 14 years. Drug dealers convicted of supplying a class A drug can be sentenced to life in prison, but out of 35,855 people convicted of the offence between 2000 and 2004, only two were handed life terms.
Maximums are exactly that - the maximum, not the average, not the minimum nut the maximum - and reserved for the most heinous examples.
cont