I have argued my belief against 'compassion' on another thread, but it bears re-stating here.
If an innocent man has been imprisoned, the the Appeals Process should be allowed to run its course, and hopefully expose any duplicity at national and international level.
The case for 'compassion's is entirely spurious. I did listen to the Justice Minister's speech, and he stated that Mr Magrahi was being allowed " ... to go home ...TO DIE" as though this is not in any way a release from prison, because he has a limited time to live.
We are all going to die - at what point is a line drawn to decide that someone 'deserves' to die at home, and not in prison, as in this case, and that of Ronnie Biggs?
The easiest way is to leave compassion out of the judicial process - it clouds legal judgement and objective decisions with sentiment, and it cannot be fair. Sincew no-one is ever likely to be conviceted for such a large number of murders ever again, surely any prisoner who is ill to what ever degree, deserves the same 'compassion' under the same argument?
That is why this decision was fundamentally wrong. The Arab extremists will taunt the West for being weak and foolish ... with good reason.