Women & Child killers

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.independen...kandahar-1921248.html

I wonder how many on here will join me in condemning these "women and child killers" this time?

In the past there have been many criticising the NATO troops if they accidentally kill a few civilians in the war zone.

But how many of these are now prepared to stand up and be counted, into condemning these murderous Taliban, those who have more innocent blood on their hands than anybody?

[anotheoldgit]

Gromit

It was so ludicrous that I didn't think it deserved an answer, but if you must have an answer, here goes.

Can you give me concrete evidence that some of the Afghan population are not concluding with the Taliban.

What about those soldiers that were shot by a man who they trusted and who they were having tea with?

There was also the time that the elders of a village gave a patrol directions straight into a Taliban ambush.

I have numerous other examples that I have been told of, by persons that have been out in Afghanistan, but these don't for some reason reach our news outlets.

There's also some interesting reading here.

http://www.reuters.co...idUSTRE55D13T20090614

[anotheoldgit]

Zeuhl

I find your post very difficult to understand, but let's try and put it into some kind of perspective, perhaps then it will become apparent that you print a load of gibberish..

Below is the actual text I posted.

/// If it was left to some of them to protect our country from attack, I would much rather have them fighting by my side, than the "traitors within" who would turn this country over to the enemy at the drop of a hat. ///

You then repeated this thus'

<< I would much rather have them fighting by my side, than the "traitors within" who would turn this country over to the enemy at the drop of a hat. >>

Now this is where it gets confusing. you posted

/// Not what you have just posted - 'traitorous (sic 'treacherous??) individuals'///

As far as I can see I was referring to traitors, so their actions would be traitorous ie having the character of a traitor (disloyal).

Not as you incorrectly described as "treacherous"

[Quinlad]

Let me try to understand you, AOG.

Presumably you support your family. If you found that one of them was killing innocent women, would it be 'traitorous' of you to speak up?

I'm just trying to work out how inordinately simplistic your world view is.

[Quinlad]

As for Our Boys, I didn't realise it was un-British to expect people on our side to display British standards of decency.

[anotheoldgit]

sherminator

/// I just find it amusing when poeple say we are under equipped.///

It is so sick, that you find it amusing.

Try telling that to the families of the 37 troops who have been killed while deployed in the "under equipped" *** Landrover.

[Oneeyedvic]

///It was so ludicrous that I didn't think it deserved an answer, but if you must have an answer, here goes.

Can you give me concrete evidence that some of the Afghan population are not concluding with the Taliban.///

Just to make this absolutely clear, are you suggesting that ALL Afghanistani people are colluding with the Taliban? becuase that is what your question implies.

[anotheoldgit]

Quinlad

//// Presumably you support your family. If you found that one of them was killing innocent women, would it be 'traitorous' of you to speak up?/// ??????????

//// As for Our Boys, I didn't realise it was un-British to expect people on our side to display British standards of decency. /// ??????????????????

Just go and have a lie down, and get your mind sorted, you are making a complete fool of yourself.

[Quinlad]

I thought that'd stump you.

[sherminator]

ok AOG we have a landrover that didnt have 'the best armour in the world tm'

but we do have harriers, sattelites, drones effective mass communication, tanks, night vision goggles, body armour, rations, supplies, apache gunships, long range missiles.

And what do our enemy have?
Ak 47s some rudimentary bombs and...not much else!

So again I'll say it quite clearly how anyone can say we are underequipped i have no idea! One of our harriers with all its missles is probably more than the entire taliban have spent on equpping its soldiers.

So again. When compared to who we are fighting do you think we are under equipped?

[anotheoldgit]

Oneeyedvic

Since my answer was to Gromit I don't see why I should bother to answer you (unless of course you are one of the same)

// I obviously condemn the perpetrators of these killings, are you now willing to give up the notion that the Afghan population are colluding with the Taliban //

That was Gromit's question, and although I had never mentioned the Afghan civilians concluding with the Taliban, this was my answer;

/// Can you give me concrete evidence that some of the Afghan population are not concluding with the Taliban. ///

For some unknown reason you then posted

/// Just to make this absolutely clear, are you suggesting that ALL Afghanistani people are colluding with the Taliban? becuase that is what your question implies.///

Now where on earth have I implied this? Just put the record straight and publish the facts.

Oneeyedvic, Gromit, or what ever your name is.

[sherminator]

oh just checking as well AOG how many landrovers do the enemy have?

and how well equipped are they?

[Oneeyedvic]

Why are you that stupid that you accuse me of using another user name - you know how it irritates you when people have done the same of you previously.

Just to confirm that I have been on this site for a number of years and have only ever posted under this user name.

Gromit has asked you a specific question:/// I obviously condemn the perpetrators of these killings, are you now willing to give up the notion that the Afghan population are colluding with the Taliban //
He then went on to repeat it and added:

///I notice you didn't answer my question, and just went straight to being offensive as usual. ///

You still haven't answered the question, so I have asked for an explanation - as at the moment it seems to me that you seem reluctant to answer it - I am trying to find out why you are reluctant to answer it.

Whilst we are at it, why haven't you given an explanation on this question that you asked as well: http://www.theanswerb...s/Question873030.html

[anotheoldgit]

sherminator

We can never be over equipped to fight a cowardly group of people such as the Taliban, but perhaps you as a supporter of the Taliban would wish them to be also equipped?

And if the tables were reversed don't you think that they would use every piece of equipment and weapons available to them, in their quest to wipe us from the face of the earth?

The only difference being there would be no one on their side protesting that they were using undo force and perhaps accidentally killing some civilians in the process,.in fact I would go further than that, and say there would not be any protests from the whole of Islam.

[sherminator]

'but perhaps you as a supporter of the Taliban would wish them to be also equipped?'

That is a new level of hilarity. Honestly mate that is my nomination for your best ever post.

Seriously if i was famous I'd have you for slander! You seem to live in your own little world and I really really Dont understand where your coming from!

Because I post a true statement about how well equipped our enemy is compared to us you then label me a taliban supporter! If i knew how to report you on this forum I Would!

[sherminator]

I'm actually astounded....still!

I've never been called a terrorist in my life!
(thats me assuming that a taliban supporter is also a terrorist mind)

Can and does anyone really take AOG seriously?

[sp1814]

AOG

In response to your original post - it would appear that everyone condemns the atrocious acts carried out by the Taliban.