ChatterBank4 mins ago
Women & Child killers
94 Answers
http://www.independen...kandahar-1921248.html
I wonder how many on here will join me in condemning these "women and child killers" this time?
In the past there have been many criticising the NATO troops if they accidentally kill a few civilians in the war zone.
But how many of these are now prepared to stand up and be counted, into condemning these murderous Taliban, those who have more innocent blood on their hands than anybody?
I wonder how many on here will join me in condemning these "women and child killers" this time?
In the past there have been many criticising the NATO troops if they accidentally kill a few civilians in the war zone.
But how many of these are now prepared to stand up and be counted, into condemning these murderous Taliban, those who have more innocent blood on their hands than anybody?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"Well there you have it again, sounds very much to me that he feels sorry for the Taliban's lack of equiptment. If I had wrote that I would have been misquoted, had it taken out of context, insulted you name it. "
Good God!
He's asking questions rhetorically. He is trying to attack a common notion regarding British equipment and how the war is seen. Jesus Christ, is that so unacceptable? I'm not saying I agree with sherm necessarily, but if you're going throw a tantrum you may as well understand what it is that's set you off.
You constantly harp on about how much you hate that the liberal left 'suppresses' freedom of expression by opposing you, then when somebody writes a post that puts an unusual slant on the war (and unusual opinions are to be welcomed and assessed in a pluralist society, I remind you), you read it as 'I HOPE THE TALIBAN WIN RAAAR'. Don't you understand how abominably simplistic that is?
GOD, I bet you're going to cr@p on again immediately after this about the "loony liberals" or whatever other agent of conspiracy it is in that paranoid head of yours trying to silence you. You're such a damn hypocrite.
Good God!
He's asking questions rhetorically. He is trying to attack a common notion regarding British equipment and how the war is seen. Jesus Christ, is that so unacceptable? I'm not saying I agree with sherm necessarily, but if you're going throw a tantrum you may as well understand what it is that's set you off.
You constantly harp on about how much you hate that the liberal left 'suppresses' freedom of expression by opposing you, then when somebody writes a post that puts an unusual slant on the war (and unusual opinions are to be welcomed and assessed in a pluralist society, I remind you), you read it as 'I HOPE THE TALIBAN WIN RAAAR'. Don't you understand how abominably simplistic that is?
GOD, I bet you're going to cr@p on again immediately after this about the "loony liberals" or whatever other agent of conspiracy it is in that paranoid head of yours trying to silence you. You're such a damn hypocrite.
This is unbelievable. I've never dealt with such stupidity and weasling out of an argument you've clearly lost! How you think you can turn this to into AOG the victim (again) is beyond me!
I said it before and i'll say it again I personally attacked you after calling me a taliban supporter. I have friends in the military so for you to say that and not think i wont take that as a personal attack is naive to the point of stupidity.
'If I had wrote that I would have been misquoted, had it taken out of context, insulted you name it.'
You took EVERYTHING i said out of context and labelled me a taliban supporter!!!!?
You're a pathetic little hypocrite and cannot handle getting beat with reasoned debate.
'Perhaps he should have a word with Brown and see if we can't send them some of our casts-offs, you know just to make things a little more fair?'
I have no idea what this means? what cast offs? Just some other random point to try and move away from the main point that you lose.
I said it before and i'll say it again I personally attacked you after calling me a taliban supporter. I have friends in the military so for you to say that and not think i wont take that as a personal attack is naive to the point of stupidity.
'If I had wrote that I would have been misquoted, had it taken out of context, insulted you name it.'
You took EVERYTHING i said out of context and labelled me a taliban supporter!!!!?
You're a pathetic little hypocrite and cannot handle getting beat with reasoned debate.
'Perhaps he should have a word with Brown and see if we can't send them some of our casts-offs, you know just to make things a little more fair?'
I have no idea what this means? what cast offs? Just some other random point to try and move away from the main point that you lose.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
In the melee, you may have missed this AOG
AOG on this thread:
//You accuse me of not answering Gromit's question, and since you are adamant that you yourself needs an explanation, I can only repeat that since I have never said that "Afghan population are colluding with the Taliban" //
anotheoldgit (Mon 15:47 05/Mar/07)...
// the Taliban are indistinguisable from the general population (civilans) so civilians are going to get killed. They are in a war zone if they can't stand the heat then they should get the hell out, or join up with our troops and get the Taliban out. Or are they actually hiding the Taliban? In which case they deserve all they get. //
AOG on this thread:
//You accuse me of not answering Gromit's question, and since you are adamant that you yourself needs an explanation, I can only repeat that since I have never said that "Afghan population are colluding with the Taliban" //
anotheoldgit (Mon 15:47 05/Mar/07)...
// the Taliban are indistinguisable from the general population (civilans) so civilians are going to get killed. They are in a war zone if they can't stand the heat then they should get the hell out, or join up with our troops and get the Taliban out. Or are they actually hiding the Taliban? In which case they deserve all they get. //
Gromit & sherminator
Just gone back to this question to see if anymore had been posted, and I noticed your posts, not wanting to be accused of weaselling out of this, here goes I can never refuse a challenge.
/// I have never said that "Afghan population are colluding with the Taliban" ///
Truth,
What I did say, /// Or are they actually hiding the Taliban? In which case they deserve all they get. ///
Please notice the question mark, I asked a question, "or are they actually hiding the Taliban"? I did not make a definite statement. "the Afghan population are colluding with the Taliban"
Slight difference to how you interpreted it isn't it?
Just gone back to this question to see if anymore had been posted, and I noticed your posts, not wanting to be accused of weaselling out of this, here goes I can never refuse a challenge.
/// I have never said that "Afghan population are colluding with the Taliban" ///
Truth,
What I did say, /// Or are they actually hiding the Taliban? In which case they deserve all they get. ///
Please notice the question mark, I asked a question, "or are they actually hiding the Taliban"? I did not make a definite statement. "the Afghan population are colluding with the Taliban"
Slight difference to how you interpreted it isn't it?
Latest Posts
Starmer's Approval Rating Plummets,
News5 mins ago
Crosswords7 mins ago
ChatterBank13 mins ago
Charging Order On Leasehold Flat
Law14 mins ago
ChatterBank15 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.