OrcadianOil, is your view that the man shouldn't have been charged with those offences, or are you just applauding the jury system ?
It seems a reasonable verdict.
The s18 gbh with intent was clearly triable , the attempted murder was not clearly so, and it added nothing. The only evidence for it was his saying 'die,die,die'.Presumably, given that, the prosecution thought the count worth including, but they surely can't have had much expectation of getting home on it..
. The proof of intent to kill in such a case is usually a non-starter. Juries aren't likely to attach much weight to angry words such as 'Die, die, die' as proof of intent to kill. The intent in the s18 gbh with intent gbh rested primarily on the severity of the attack and the implement used. The s18 was definitely triable, for the jury to decide what intent the defendant had. An angry or provoked man's intent is still an intent, after all ! But it's no surprise that the jury found they couldn't be sure that he had the specific intent to cause the really serious bodily injury at the very moment he inflicted it. He did cause such injury but that does not, in itself, prove an intent to cause it.