ChatterBank1 min ago
Is anyone really bothered?
153 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/4wh46ps
So England's wicket keeper has found the need to announce that he is gay, does that mean the others will now have to announce they are heterosexual?
In the scheme of things why do homosexuals think it is so important to announce their sexuality to all and sundry?
/// He said he could no longer bear to lie about his sexuality. ///
/// "I'm comfortable with who I am - and happy to say who I am in public," ///
/// I feel it is right to be out in the open about my sexuality. If more people do it, the more acceptable it will become. That must be a good thing. ///
Do they think that they are that important, and that anyone is at all interested in their sexuality? I know that I am not.
So England's wicket keeper has found the need to announce that he is gay, does that mean the others will now have to announce they are heterosexual?
In the scheme of things why do homosexuals think it is so important to announce their sexuality to all and sundry?
/// He said he could no longer bear to lie about his sexuality. ///
/// "I'm comfortable with who I am - and happy to say who I am in public," ///
/// I feel it is right to be out in the open about my sexuality. If more people do it, the more acceptable it will become. That must be a good thing. ///
Do they think that they are that important, and that anyone is at all interested in their sexuality? I know that I am not.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.pa_ul,
If your innuendo to me was to find out if I was some kind of "closet homosexual" - no, sorry, I'm just a boring old heterosexual who has only ever been "turned on" by the female form - I'm male.
As for the other inane comments aimed at me, no, there's no way I'd assiciate myself with the unnatural acts mob, no matter how much "Pride" they, and other misguided individuals, may have in their heinous activities.
"Pride"? More like "Shame".
If your innuendo to me was to find out if I was some kind of "closet homosexual" - no, sorry, I'm just a boring old heterosexual who has only ever been "turned on" by the female form - I'm male.
As for the other inane comments aimed at me, no, there's no way I'd assiciate myself with the unnatural acts mob, no matter how much "Pride" they, and other misguided individuals, may have in their heinous activities.
"Pride"? More like "Shame".
-- answer removed --
alright ETY, I wasn't suggesting anything, I just said I wondered! There's no need to ram your heterosexuality down my throat!!
I too am male and have only ever been turned on by females, but I don't get all aggitated and defensive at the thought of two strapping young men getting all amorous with each other!
I too am male and have only ever been turned on by females, but I don't get all aggitated and defensive at the thought of two strapping young men getting all amorous with each other!
mightywease
Maybe you should watch the Graham Norton show or perhaps Alan Carr or Paul O' Grady who manage to accept "It's only a joke" line without classing them homophobic comments.
But there are some who wish to destroy all humour by labelling it either racist, sexist, homophobic.
But then that is their problem.
Maybe you should watch the Graham Norton show or perhaps Alan Carr or Paul O' Grady who manage to accept "It's only a joke" line without classing them homophobic comments.
But there are some who wish to destroy all humour by labelling it either racist, sexist, homophobic.
But then that is their problem.
Hmmm ...
On THAT point, I do agree with AOG.
Graham N, at least on telly, is a big one for being crudely explicit, and then saying "It's just a joke".
If he is not the same in real life, then isn't he portraying an artificial image?
And aren't we saying that it's wrong to put forward an artificial image?
I'm a bit confused over this one.
On THAT point, I do agree with AOG.
Graham N, at least on telly, is a big one for being crudely explicit, and then saying "It's just a joke".
If he is not the same in real life, then isn't he portraying an artificial image?
And aren't we saying that it's wrong to put forward an artificial image?
I'm a bit confused over this one.
Graham Norton trades in innuendos and jokes about sex. They may not be to everyone's taste but neither are they homophobic.
There is a lot of difference between calling your imaginary friend "Everard" as Larry Grayson did suggesting that men shouldn't turn there back on someone who is gay. The implication being that the gay man will try and flump them up the arse.
There is a lot of difference between calling your imaginary friend "Everard" as Larry Grayson did suggesting that men shouldn't turn there back on someone who is gay. The implication being that the gay man will try and flump them up the arse.