Donate SIGN UP

So It Was A Fake . . . .

Avatar Image
Canary42 | 23:33 Sun 22nd Jan 2023 | News
58 Answers
. . . . or was it ? How can we be confident she's telling the truth now. Will this help restore Andrew to the ranks of the righteous?

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/duke-york-virginia-giuffre-photo-103410088.html

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 58rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So you believe Maxwell? Perlease!
Question Author
Exactly my point
Why would anyone go to the trouble of faking a picture like this?

What purpose would it supposedly serve?

Andrew is embarking on a campaign to 'clear his name' and if he is using the word of a convicted felon as a starting point, it simply proves that he has learned nothing, which is entirely in character for a fool like him.
It’s not just the picture, it’s the fact that his accuser has dropped a case against someone else saying she may have made a mistake. I never trusted her motives - and I don’t blame him one bit for trying to reclaim his life.
//Why would anyone go to the trouble of faking a picture like this?//

Lots of reasons: to incriminate & stigmatise someone, it's done all the time using Photoshop, remember Diana & Dodi kissing?
It doesn’t look fake to me, but what do I know lol.
Andrew's attempt to re-enter a world of public attention is based on his seriously misplaced belief that public attention needs and misses his presence.

The only person who needs him in public is himself - the man is an ego on legs.
When he does 'reclaim his life' will he also reclaim the millions paid to someone he didn't know for something he didn't do?
//Andrew's attempt to re-enter a world of public attention is based on his seriously misplaced belief that public attention needs and misses his presence. //

Is it? And you know this ... how?
Busy work, nothing more. The high priced lawyers can't believe their luck I'm sure.
Ha ha, yes that is on the back of The Zookeepers boot.

As for Andrew relying on that photo, I would have thought he would have started all of this well before Maxwell said anything, it being fake has been raised before though.

I can quite see how he was pressured to settle given the Jubilee and such like but I'm not sure it will will do Andrew much good to drag it all up again. Even if he wins the "No smoke without Fire" brigade will never let it go.
I personally don't believe her. I also think Charles, who is weak, will eventually allow him back into the fold, unfortunately.
"Is it? And you know this ... how?"
probably in the same way people "know" that harry is being meghan's puppet, he's weak, she's controlling, they lie about everyhting and so on
bednobs - // "Is it? And you know this ... how?"
probably in the same way people "know" that harry is being meghan's puppet, he's weak, she's controlling, they lie about everyhting and so on //

Although the questioner offers her views and opinions , simply as her views and opinions, and there is nothing wrong with that - she is always keen to demand 'proof' from anyone else, who offers a view that opposes her own.

I simply offered my view based on what I have concluded from the media, which is all the questioner ever does - but for her, the rules of debate are 'different'.
AH, this isn't the first time lately you’ve addressed my post through someone else and referred to me in vague terms like ‘the questioner’. Are you not speaking to me for some reason unknown to me?
Bednobs, we know Harry and Meghan lie. We’ve heard them. That’s not conjecture.
Are you not speaking to me for some reason unknown to me?
you arent expecting an answer? this is answerbank of course - - te daaah!

well she wd - wdnt she? ( say it is a fake)

Randy Andy wants the lu-lu doesnt he? the moolah that goes with official duties. And he DID bed the girlies but not that one. Hardly a strong case to overturn anything

1 to 20 of 58rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

So It Was A Fake . . . .

Answer Question >>