thanks, squarebear, that's also what I would have said.
Watching a quiz show tonight, was amazed when that answer was ruled incorrect - think they need to check their sources
I must admit I would have said 1, but just put in 'prime number definition' into google and every site says the same as ken's answer, so looks like the correct answer is 2.
Hi seekeerz!
The set of prime numbers has always excluded the number 1.
If 1 were included then there would be NO prime numbers, because 1 is a factor of every whole number.
So any consideration of primes begins with the number 2.
Take care and have a happy Christmas.