Moon landing?

[Bazile]

I watched a television program where a number of scientists were casting doubt that there was a moon landing .

They gave various reasons for their doubts - one reason that i can recall was something to do with a belt / band of radiation above the earth which they claim would have been deadly to the crew of the spacecraft .

However given the large number of people that would have been involved in the missions - surely it would have been impossible to pull off such ' hoaxes ' without someone spilling the beans by now ?

[Loosehead]

Perlease.... All hoax areas debunked to order :

http://www.clavius.org/

They definately wen, no doubt at all, van allen belt:

http://www.clavius.org/envrad.html

I can't beleive there are still people who doubt it. Not just for the reasons you give about disclosure. It's been discussed on here many times. Essentially it would have been easier to go to the moon than to fake all the evidence. eg 800kg of moon rocks available on request to any proper lab in the world to analyse, never any doubt of their origin.

Still there is a whole conspiracy theory industry who want to sell their books and DVD's to the gullible.

This one's actually gone a bit quiet what with more recent things like Dianna and then the 2 towers. Remember the old ones though, Titanic wasn't etc there's always been conspiracy theories.

[Peter Pedant]

yeah and those airplanes crashing into the twin towers,

I mean they;re obviously Holograms to disguise the missiles that the CIA or do I mean MI5, do the yanks have an MI5 ? - that the CIA fired into the building.

and Diana, she really did marry Dodi and is now on the moon - a little bit along from where they didnt land.

[jake-the-peg]

Bazile the best evidence I know to show that this is not a hoax is the laser reflectors left on the moon by the Astronauts.

http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/SEhelp/A polloLaser.html

Since then numerous researchers have used this to reflect lasers and measure the moon's distance