Motoring4 mins ago
So It Was A Fake . . . .
. . . . or was it ? How can we be confident she's telling the truth now. Will this help restore Andrew to the ranks of the righteous?
https:/ /uk.yah oo.com/ news/du ke-york -virgin ia-giuf fre-pho to-1034 10088.h tml
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Why would anyone go to the trouble of faking a picture like this?
What purpose would it supposedly serve?
Andrew is embarking on a campaign to 'clear his name' and if he is using the word of a convicted felon as a starting point, it simply proves that he has learned nothing, which is entirely in character for a fool like him.
What purpose would it supposedly serve?
Andrew is embarking on a campaign to 'clear his name' and if he is using the word of a convicted felon as a starting point, it simply proves that he has learned nothing, which is entirely in character for a fool like him.
this one appears to be genuine
https:/ /www.to mrichmo nd.com/ latest- for-viz -4/31/0 3/2020/
https:/
As for Andrew relying on that photo, I would have thought he would have started all of this well before Maxwell said anything, it being fake has been raised before though.
I can quite see how he was pressured to settle given the Jubilee and such like but I'm not sure it will will do Andrew much good to drag it all up again. Even if he wins the "No smoke without Fire" brigade will never let it go.
I can quite see how he was pressured to settle given the Jubilee and such like but I'm not sure it will will do Andrew much good to drag it all up again. Even if he wins the "No smoke without Fire" brigade will never let it go.
bednobs - // "Is it? And you know this ... how?"
probably in the same way people "know" that harry is being meghan's puppet, he's weak, she's controlling, they lie about everyhting and so on //
Although the questioner offers her views and opinions , simply as her views and opinions, and there is nothing wrong with that - she is always keen to demand 'proof' from anyone else, who offers a view that opposes her own.
I simply offered my view based on what I have concluded from the media, which is all the questioner ever does - but for her, the rules of debate are 'different'.
probably in the same way people "know" that harry is being meghan's puppet, he's weak, she's controlling, they lie about everyhting and so on //
Although the questioner offers her views and opinions , simply as her views and opinions, and there is nothing wrong with that - she is always keen to demand 'proof' from anyone else, who offers a view that opposes her own.
I simply offered my view based on what I have concluded from the media, which is all the questioner ever does - but for her, the rules of debate are 'different'.
Are you not speaking to me for some reason unknown to me?
you arent expecting an answer? this is answerbank of course - - te daaah!
well she wd - wdnt she? ( say it is a fake)
Randy Andy wants the lu-lu doesnt he? the moolah that goes with official duties. And he DID bed the girlies but not that one. Hardly a strong case to overturn anything
you arent expecting an answer? this is answerbank of course - - te daaah!
well she wd - wdnt she? ( say it is a fake)
Randy Andy wants the lu-lu doesnt he? the moolah that goes with official duties. And he DID bed the girlies but not that one. Hardly a strong case to overturn anything