Spam & Scams0 min ago
"We're going to need a bigger boat....."
99 Answers
I would certainly agree with Mr. Ken Ham that an ark made of a bathtub would be very dangerous - think of the overcrowding, with the giraffes and elephants and all - Whats interesting is that, in the world of Ham,nothing is wrong with the story, just the depiction, giving those pesky secularists ammo to brainwash the children ;)
http:// blogs.a nswersi ...b-ar ks-are- dangero us/
http://
Answers
Ken Ham probably knows as much about ark building as those other two charlatans, Ken Shem, and Ken Japheth.
08:43 Fri 17th Aug 2012
My major objection to that is that no such offer to the neighbours exists in the Bible. You're not referring to parts of the story from the much earlier Akkadian or Sumerian versions, are you?
However, if we were to accept this non-Biblical addition, an omniscient God must, by definition, already know they'd turn down any such opportunity to repent.
And to suggest that for the sake of the mere possibillity of saving his neighbours, which, even being generous cannot amount to more than a few hundred people, is to also suggest that the only other people with the potential to be save were conveniently located near to Noah. It seems a bit of a stretch, no?
Doesn't wash, Sandy. Sorry.
However, if we were to accept this non-Biblical addition, an omniscient God must, by definition, already know they'd turn down any such opportunity to repent.
And to suggest that for the sake of the mere possibillity of saving his neighbours, which, even being generous cannot amount to more than a few hundred people, is to also suggest that the only other people with the potential to be save were conveniently located near to Noah. It seems a bit of a stretch, no?
Doesn't wash, Sandy. Sorry.
New Yorker cartoon. A lion says to Noah "We've run out of antelope"
But the story of a flood devastating the world, leaving but one pair of humans (rather than a family), is found elsewhere isn't it? It's certainly in Ovid (died 17 AD), in his Metamorphoses. And isn't it in the Epic of Gilgamesh, of about 3,700 years ago, written in Mesopotamia? Don't think either of those mentioned saving all the animals.Perhaps the writers had more practical sense.Or perhaps they hadn't the right god to inform their writing.
But the story of a flood devastating the world, leaving but one pair of humans (rather than a family), is found elsewhere isn't it? It's certainly in Ovid (died 17 AD), in his Metamorphoses. And isn't it in the Epic of Gilgamesh, of about 3,700 years ago, written in Mesopotamia? Don't think either of those mentioned saving all the animals.Perhaps the writers had more practical sense.Or perhaps they hadn't the right god to inform their writing.
birdie #dodo or two). Let us think about how they could be contained and kept healthy for 40 days and nights.#
Just as a point of interest it was the rain that fell for 40 days the flood flooded the world for 150 days ( 7 months ) but the world was still flooded and it was another 3 months before he let the animals out , into a dead world with not a living thing plant or animal for Noah's animals to live on.
Just as a point of interest it was the rain that fell for 40 days the flood flooded the world for 150 days ( 7 months ) but the world was still flooded and it was another 3 months before he let the animals out , into a dead world with not a living thing plant or animal for Noah's animals to live on.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
SandyI don't think anybody would have wanted to swim in that water dues to all the dead vegitation and animals floating around, all the fish and other fresh water and saltwater life would also have died when all the fresh water and sea waters, all the cold waters and warm waters collided and mixed etc, I think the sea would have been highly polluted, don't you?