I would certainly agree with Mr. Ken Ham that an ark made of a bathtub would be very dangerous - think of the overcrowding, with the giraffes and elephants and all - Whats interesting is that, in the world of Ham,nothing is wrong with the story, just the depiction, giving those pesky secularists ammo to brainwash the children ;)
You're confusing the wardrobe with the ark Duncer. The animals go in the ark and the clothes in the wardrobe. A wardrobe would be completely unsuitable for saving animals from a deluge. They're not watertight for a start.
I think Mr. Ham has demonstrated his ignorance by showing an illustration of a type of hull that is intended to be propelled through the water. The underwater protrusion at the bow is either a ram designed for sinking enemy ships as used by the ancient greeks or an aid to more efficient movement through the water. Either way he would need to dump all the animals overboard in order to house enough oarsmen to take advantage of this feature.
didn't think of looking for one of those. Would I be correct in thinking that it is a platform that can be lowered on levers manned by anxious looking oarsmen?
Don't be silly jom. You know perfectly well it's a big wooden one with a propellor the size of a windmill, powered by two teams of oxen on a treadmill. Let's keep within the bounds of reality shall we?
(Sorry, make that one team of oxen and a team of hippos, or something else.)
Perhaps something like a sternwheeler with elephants inside it running as fast as they can to avoid being drowned. To go faster you just lower it further into the water.