Donate SIGN UP

Gods Will

Avatar Image
nailit | 18:04 Mon 23rd Jun 2014 | Religion & Spirituality
136 Answers
can any believer in religion please tell me why an almighty, omnipotent god needs people to do his bidding here on earth?
Had a conversation with a couple of JW door knockers a few days ago who were convinced that they were doing gods work, I asked them why he cant do his own work. if he wants me to know about the bible why cant he tell me himself? Its something that ive noticed with others....evangelical christians, mormons etc. Its the same with muslim fanatics who believe that commiting attrocities is doing gods work. If god's got a problem with infidels why cant he sort it himself?
I'd be genuinely interested to hear from anyone who believes that they are doing gods work and tell me why god cant do things for himself.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 136rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by nailit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Khandro, //People on both sides of the argument putting forward a worthless caricature of the real thing.... //

You actually claim to 'know' what the 'real thing' is?

Hello, VE. Good to see you. :o)
I do so enjoy Goodlife's non sequiturs. But I do know my bible. I know it very well. But I still can't see what I have to accept it as valid. It is no more convincing truth than Grimm's Fairy Tales. I read the bible to find ammunition against believers. And believe me, I find tons of ammunition.
//I still can't see what I have to accept it as valid.//

How can anyone accept and of it as valid when it's so very contradictory? If one bit is wrong, then the whole must be called into question.
How can anyone accept *any*.....
The real answer is that he doesn't need us to do anything for him, but it's part of a testing process. He created us with free will, and wants to see if we're worthy of going to live with him when we die.

We can only do this by choosing to do his will. This could be anything from wearing a funny hat on Tuesdays to only eating fish while standing on one leg to killing people we think he might not approve of. It's not clear though - you pretty much have to guess what he wants because there are various different versions of it that no-one can agree on.

It's all very strange and mysterious but that's the way he rolls.
The validity of the bible is that it exists, thus proving that the author(s) of the bible could write or could afford to employ a scribe, or had a scribe as a slave or knew somebody who had nothing better to do than write down their rambling accounts of poorly remembered events.
That is all.
Ludwig; I believe your opening, "The real answer is that he doesn't need us to do anything for him" is sufficient and correct, the rest of your post is tripe, but I guess you really know that. :-)
// the rest of your post is tripe, but I guess you really know that. :-) //

Actually no. I thought the opening was tripe but It got better toward the end.
Ludwig; Well it seems we can't trust which kind of tripe it is you are writing. :-)
I thought it got less tripey towards the end....
why is god testing us? Doesn't he know us then?

// why is god testing us? Doesn't he know us then? //

We don't know. It's a mystery to most of us. Khandro seems to have the answers but he's pretty mysterious too - he drops the odd pearl of wisdom wrapped in a riddle every now and then.
Did you ever seen Kung fu with David Carradine? He's a bit like the fat monk with funny eyes to our grasshopper.
Kung fu? Huh? X
-- answer removed --
Ludwig; I think the correct pronunciation is "glasshopper".
I'm pleased my 'pearls' are not entirely dropping before swine though. :o)
andy-hughes, /almost all believers go about killing people\
That's quite a statement to make don't you think. Where did you get your information from?
Almost all "believers of any faith".
Cannedgranny, actually, he didn't make that statement did he? he has implied it though, I think that particular implication was unintentional to be honest.
No. I think he meant believers of almost all faiths. Not almost all believers.
Having a problem with page becoming unresponsive. however, Pixie and ratter please don't twist his words to suit yourselves. His words were ALL OF ANY FAITH.
I can see his words. I have read enough of Andy's posts to know he is not hysterical and irrational. Hopefully, he will return soon to speak for himself. I will be amazed if he returns to say he thinks almost all believers are killers, though.

21 to 40 of 136rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Gods Will

Answer Question >>