The Truth Of The Bible.

[Theland]

Only the bible describes the state of the world as we head into the End Times.
Only the bible has verifiable prophecies that can be tested for truth.
Is it not time to take the bible seriously?

[andy-hughes]

Apologies Khandro, my question is to Theland, I do get you two mixed up, can't imagine why!!!

[Theland]

And the question is?

[andy-hughes]

Theland, it's two posts ago!

I know you don't pay attention, but come on!!!

[Theland]

Sun 12:55 - how does that post to Khandro relate to me?

[andy-hughes]

Just above your post asking what the question is, is my post apologising to Khandro, you really don't pay attention do you.

[Theland]

I pay attention but don't get it. What's the question related to me?

[andy-hughes]

OK, since you are being deliberately obstructive and refusing to see that the question inadvertently asked to Khando was clearly for you -

Why do you persist in peddling this viewpoint which, although clearly valid and important to you, receives virtually no support but entire reams of negative responses?

You do it repeatedly, always the same message, always the same responses, which refute your message.

Then you accuse responders of either being too stupid to interperet the bible in the way that seems open only to you, or you accuse them of being ignorant non-believers.

My question is - if you have posted this argument endless of times, anyone who agrees with you has done so silently and without response, and those who don't agree, you won't debate or discuss with, so why on earth are you still doing this?

What do you hope to achieve?

It cannot be acceptnace and agreement - even you must see that you are not being agreed with in any way shape or form.

That's my question THELAND - why are you still doing this?

[andy-hughes]

Are you there Theland?

[andy-hughes]

nailit - //
//Are you there Theland? //

Are are you there Andy?
Why do you insist on removing my posts that actually defend the right to let Theland and others to have their views? //

I am not minded to get into pointless arguments about moderation, they tend to be removed anyway, but for the record, I have not removed any posts of yours for as long as I can remember, and while we are here, I did not close the thread on which we were engaged in an exchange.

[nailit]

//I have not removed any posts of yours for as long as I can remember, and while we are here, I did not close the thread on which we were engaged in an exchange//

If thats true, then thank you & I owe you an apology.
On the other hand, there must be some some weird mod about.

[nailit]

Its all getting a bit silly now....

[andy-hughes]

nailit - // If thats true, then thank you & I owe you an apology. //

It is, I would never lie about something like that - and thank you, your apology is accepted of course.

// On the other hand, there must be some some weird mod about. //

No comment - obviously!!

[THECORBYLOON]

If that deleted post was the one quoted in ANDY's post, I suggest you print this off as a reminder.

"Any posts asking or discussing why a post or thread was removed or closed, or why a member was banned or suspended, will be removed."

[Mamyalynne]

Theland is entitled to repeat himself as often as he wants to - we all are.

Very easy to walk away if you feel you have seen enough.

[Khandro]

Mamya. says; //Theland is entitled to repeat himself as often as he wants to - we all are.//

I say, hear hear!

[anneasquith]

So is it now acceptable for abers to have a one to one discussion with a mod re previous posts ?

[andy-hughes]

anne - // So is it now acceptable for abers to have a one to one discussion with a mod re previous posts ? //

I doubt it.

I would hardly call it a 'discussion' - nailit was aggrieved that a post of his was removed, and appeared to believe that I was the party responsible.

I was happy to correct his assumption, and that's the end of the issue.

If the posts involved are removed, then so be it, but I am certainly not in the habit of instigating, or encouraging such discussions.

But I balance that against the need for erroneous impressions about my moderation, and the reasons behind it, and my personal need to defend my integrity.

[anneasquith]

So it happens, but is not acceptable ?

[douglas9401]

It's becoming clear why strict gun control is required in this country.