History will prove it is man made if you are dogmatic, take up a position, and then only search for the evidence that supports your view.
It is often difficult to be completely objective without allowing our own prejudices to colour our verdicts. I think.
Naomi - The council simply made a final agreement on what was to be included in the canon of scripture. A rubber stamp if you like, as the scripture concerned were already in use and widely accepted. However, other so called scriptures, like the Apocrypha and other mythologies, were likely to creep in unless a decision was made to declare the existing accepted scriptures complete. This measure simply stopped the "extras" from being included.
Men made the decision not to allow more into the already accepted canon of scripture.
But, men also wrote the Bible .... inspired by the Holy Spirit. Not men using their own imagination.
And that's entirely the point. It WAS written by human authors.
Written, translated, mis-translated, editted, censored, interpreted, mis-interpreted over the centuries by humans one and all.
And it's humans that have decided that there was some kind of devine influence.
I suppose claiming divine influence is the only way to get around the fact that so many anonymous people with unknown motives had a hand in its evolution.
Even if the authors and editors were divinely inspired, how can anyone say they KNOW that? Call me sceptical if you like, but it all sounds just a little suspect to me. Convenient though I suppose.
Naomi - I would say that the Bible is divinely inspired, by virtue of the fact that its prophecies regarding Israel are accurate.
Compare the history of Israel with the prophecies. No man inspired such accuracy.
Also, the present day situation in the Middle East also echos the prophecies.
Check it out and see for yourself.