News1 min ago
European Superleague...........grotesque Concept?
70 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /sport/ footbal l/56800 351
Once again Football tries to extract yet more dosh for the big few. I haven't seen anyone in the Football world on favour yet. Pundits, fans, sports journalists all seem to agree it would be a disaster. Should the teams and players be banned from the rest of football if they go ahead?
Once again Football tries to extract yet more dosh for the big few. I haven't seen anyone in the Football world on favour yet. Pundits, fans, sports journalists all seem to agree it would be a disaster. Should the teams and players be banned from the rest of football if they go ahead?
Answers
Call me an old cynic ("You're an old cynic, Dave"), but this reeks of the same brinkmanship that was used by the putative 'breakaway' Premier League Clubs in 1990 - who also were going to be a closed competition, no promotion/ relegation. All they were really after was a much bigger share of the TV money and more seats on the governing body - which is exactly what...
11:56 Mon 19th Apr 2021
The problem, TTT, is that players have signed contracts to play for the clubs in whatever competition they are chosen to do so.
The pure, unadulterated greed of the owners of these 12 clubs - among the richest in Europe, if not the world - is obscene. And the statement by the Real Madrid president - "...responding to wishes of fans" is jus plain laughable.
The pure, unadulterated greed of the owners of these 12 clubs - among the richest in Europe, if not the world - is obscene. And the statement by the Real Madrid president - "...responding to wishes of fans" is jus plain laughable.
Money talks. It's difficult to see how this proposal can be defeated if the plan is to throw billions at the teams within it. I should stress that I hope it *is* blocked, or at least the most punitive sanctions possible applied. It's notable, too, that the English clubs involved are in the main led by foreign owners, particularly US-based owners, as the idea seems to me to be very similar to, say, the NFL or some such franchised competition.
gawd even the politicians are getting involved now:
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/e uropean -super- league- ministe rs-are- urgentl y-seeki ng-advi ce-on-h ow-to-s top-top -footba ll-club s-joini ng-1227 9890
https:/
Arrods, the premier league etc is, as far as day to day playing goes just a fancy name for the old Div 1, ditto the "Championship" etc, I still think of them as Div 1-4. The main difference here is that the proposed super league has no relegations/promotions thus the clubs are not under pressure once they are in it.
// The problem, TTT, is that players have signed contracts to play for the clubs in whatever competition they are chosen to do so.//
The answer to this depends greatly on the contracts in question, but it's more than likely that players will be awarded bonuses based on performance in the league. It stands to reason that if the teams are kicked out of their respective leagues then the clubs could be held in breach of contract by denying the opportunity for such bonuses.
It's also more than likely that the relevant clubs make obligations to their players to stick to rules of FIFA/UEFA etc. They are manifestly not doing this; ergo, players objecting can hold the clubs in breach of contract over *that* point, if nothing else.
The answer to this depends greatly on the contracts in question, but it's more than likely that players will be awarded bonuses based on performance in the league. It stands to reason that if the teams are kicked out of their respective leagues then the clubs could be held in breach of contract by denying the opportunity for such bonuses.
It's also more than likely that the relevant clubs make obligations to their players to stick to rules of FIFA/UEFA etc. They are manifestly not doing this; ergo, players objecting can hold the clubs in breach of contract over *that* point, if nothing else.
It's an appalling, disgusting concept that goes against one of the things that football is built on; the open competition that lets smaller clubs dream of playing larger ones. Those smaller clubs - and by extension, the communities around them - would suffer as the money that has always trickled down from the top dries up.
The clubs involved will have to answer to the fans & I sincerely hope they're loud & vociferous in their condemnation of the scheme.
FIFA have already said that any players involved would be denied the chance to play for their countries again & I wonder how many will be keen to accept that?
I guess we'll see who's in it for the money & who cares more about the sport. Boardrooms v just about everybody else. Probably go to penalties & could be an interesting scoreline when the dust settles.
The clubs involved will have to answer to the fans & I sincerely hope they're loud & vociferous in their condemnation of the scheme.
FIFA have already said that any players involved would be denied the chance to play for their countries again & I wonder how many will be keen to accept that?
I guess we'll see who's in it for the money & who cares more about the sport. Boardrooms v just about everybody else. Probably go to penalties & could be an interesting scoreline when the dust settles.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.