Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Cameron V. The Conservatives
Not entirely sure if this counts as "news" since the original story dates back as far as September although this article appeared in Today's Guardian:
http://
and the original story here
http://
How'd this one happen? Accepting Ian Hudspeth's version of the figures suggests that Cameron has an awfully inaccurate understanding of how his policies are actually working. This is, to say the least, not very impressive.
http://
and the original story here
http://
How'd this one happen? Accepting Ian Hudspeth's version of the figures suggests that Cameron has an awfully inaccurate understanding of how his policies are actually working. This is, to say the least, not very impressive.
Answers
1 to 6 of 6
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jim360. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Cuts? On another thread today, presumably left wing, people thought that Cottaging Officers and Breastfeeding Coordinators were a perfectly fine way for councils to spend money.
If they didn't close the odd library, I'm at a loss to think where they could save money.
http://
Ps. You should have read some of letters beneath the local paper's story before using it to bolster your argument.
If they didn't close the odd library, I'm at a loss to think where they could save money.
http://
Ps. You should have read some of letters beneath the local paper's story before using it to bolster your argument.
-- answer removed --
Not really sure what TTT's point is, unless it's that "well our man may be totally crap but at least he's not even crapper" -- which doesn't really provide much comfort as that still leaves us with crap in charge!
Also svejk, what letters? If you mean the comments underneath the Oxford article, I've not read them no. But that would still leave us with a letter written (or, more likely, read and signed) by Cameron that is filled with mistakes, or worse. Coming from the Prime Minister, or from his office, it does not bode well when the lawmakers don't appear to appreciate the full consequences of their laws and decisions.
Also svejk, what letters? If you mean the comments underneath the Oxford article, I've not read them no. But that would still leave us with a letter written (or, more likely, read and signed) by Cameron that is filled with mistakes, or worse. Coming from the Prime Minister, or from his office, it does not bode well when the lawmakers don't appear to appreciate the full consequences of their laws and decisions.
1 to 6 of 6
