The way to go. Excellent. I found it noisy with instruments being discarded and background chatter but not bothersome. Effects gradually wear off in about four hours.
Yes....I have .
30 years ago.....(R) hip replacement under general anaesthesia.
25 years ago....(L) hip replacement under "spinal."..epidural or whatever.
No contest.....epidural was the better experience for all the reasons given by above.
I`m glad you have posted this. My best friend is going to have a hip replacement and she wants to have it done this way. I thought she was mad but obviously not.
I opted to have epidural but after three failed attempts I was given a general anesthetic. I have a friend who had an epidural and had absolutely no problems whatsoever.
hi,like sqad ive ha it done both under general and under spinal , and i vant really remember much difference. i remember being aware enough with the spinal that i remember them puttin me on my side in a vice like thing (and i remember bein surprised they did it on my side) but after that dont remember much as i had sedation