Bloodlands, Final Episode

Paigntonian | 22:01 Sun 14th Mar 2021 | Film, Media & TV

24 Answers

Disappointing in the end. The postcards? The changed necklace? The motivation of gangster to kill priest's daughter?

Tommy Cooper. The Plank.

Grace

Answers

21 to 24 of 24

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Paigntonian. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Paigntonian

Question Author

alava: BBC iPLayer.

Lie-in King

I thoroughly enjoyed this, thought it a good ending & it seems to me there's a fair bit left to work with in the 2nd series.

maggiebee

Maybe all will be explained in the next series? Must admit I felt a bit let down by the final episode of Series 1.

ichkeria

I also thought it was good. Worth it alone for the shots (so to speak) of Strangford Lough.
With these things there’s always a temptation to turn the whole plot on its head with a wholly unconvincing final twist, but Bloodlands didn’t do that. So much of what actually happened was revealed earth on, such as who kidnapped Keenan.
There wasn’t really a “Goliath” after all, not in the way people thought at the time. The postcards, which were of the Goliath cranes at H&W, were a ploy by the doctor and Adam Corry to get the case into the disappearance of their father and brother reopened.

21 to 24 of 24

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?