ChatterBank1 min ago
Sue Gray's Labour Activist Son
Sue Gray was last night facing fresh questions about alleged bias as pictures of her son, Liam Conlon, standing alongside Sir Keir Starmer emerged – including one taken during her Partygate probe.
The pictures reignited the ‘impartiality’ row engulfing the former top civil servant after she quit her Whitehall role last week to become Sir Keir’s chief of staff.
Liam Conlon is chair of the Labour Party Irish Society, and has recently campaigned for Labour candidate Danny Beales in Boris Johnson’s Uxbridge seat in west London.
Meanwhile, Sue Gray, reportedly a friend of Keir Starmer since his time as Director of Public Prosecutions, still hasn't said when conversations with Starmer regarding her new appointment began, a question Starmer has also avoided answering.
https:/
The plot thickens…. and it's a stinky one.
The pictures reignited the ‘impartiality’ row engulfing the former top civil servant after she quit her Whitehall role last week to become Sir Keir’s chief of staff.
Liam Conlon is chair of the Labour Party Irish Society, and has recently campaigned for Labour candidate Danny Beales in Boris Johnson’s Uxbridge seat in west London.
Meanwhile, Sue Gray, reportedly a friend of Keir Starmer since his time as Director of Public Prosecutions, still hasn't said when conversations with Starmer regarding her new appointment began, a question Starmer has also avoided answering.
https:/
The plot thickens…. and it's a stinky one.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The Police investigated the Parties in Downing Street and found the Prime Minister and 82 other people had broken the rules and fined them.
How could Sue Gray in her final report after the police investigation had finished, have concluded anything other than what she did?
There is no bias whatsoever, there is the evidence, there are the prosecutions, and now there will be the consequences.
How could Sue Gray in her final report after the police investigation had finished, have concluded anything other than what she did?
There is no bias whatsoever, there is the evidence, there are the prosecutions, and now there will be the consequences.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.