Jobs & Education6 mins ago
All Over for Diana conspiracy theories?
Anyone out there still believe Princess Diana was deliberately bumped off? I do, but don't ask me how or why - it's just a gut feeling.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by flipnflap. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't believe there was any conspiracy involved in the deaths at all,it was an accident that was caused by several factors. If the occupants of the car had been wearing seatbelts they may have survived.
I wonder what this man will do with his life now its all over
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7322347.st m
I wonder what this man will do with his life now its all over
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7322347.st m
Three points:
1. Strange that the Duke of Edinburgh had to go into hospital at the same time as the verdict was being announced. Guilty conscience maybe playing on his heart?
2. Members of the paparazi can also be attached to the secret services
3. Someone was wicked enough to put thoughts in her head about an imminent car crash.
1. Strange that the Duke of Edinburgh had to go into hospital at the same time as the verdict was being announced. Guilty conscience maybe playing on his heart?
2. Members of the paparazi can also be attached to the secret services
3. Someone was wicked enough to put thoughts in her head about an imminent car crash.
-- answer removed --
Something to be said from both sides, but why do those who do not agree with any conspiracy theory get so up-tight about it all? I quote Loosehead for one, gullible idiots religious nutters, ignorant.
Not one person on this site can say for certain what really took place. So please if you have made up your own mind, given all the evidence put before you, please allow others to make their own personal decision on matters.
From a personal view point, I am not happy when the media announce that the Jury have not chosen a murder verdict by the secret service or the royals. They were not given that option, they were told by the coroner what options they could choose from.
Are the paparazzi now to stand trial for un-lawful killing?
Not one person on this site can say for certain what really took place. So please if you have made up your own mind, given all the evidence put before you, please allow others to make their own personal decision on matters.
From a personal view point, I am not happy when the media announce that the Jury have not chosen a murder verdict by the secret service or the royals. They were not given that option, they were told by the coroner what options they could choose from.
Are the paparazzi now to stand trial for un-lawful killing?
I for one will believe this verdict for one reason only.....
It's the only verdict there will ever be!
No one will know what happened, be it this or anything else! So I think it's time to wrap it up and put her to rest!
My honest opinion is that if 'they' wanted to kill her, they could have done it some other way, not like it happened! I do feel it was a tragic accident!
It's the only verdict there will ever be!
No one will know what happened, be it this or anything else! So I think it's time to wrap it up and put her to rest!
My honest opinion is that if 'they' wanted to kill her, they could have done it some other way, not like it happened! I do feel it was a tragic accident!
Ye, agree, could have been done in a simpler way than a car accident, as to why I just think it was an accident!
It's funny that all her life as a Royal she was hounded by the press (she used the press too, I must add), but she wanted to be left alone byt he end. Now it's still happening, even now she is dead!
It's funny that all her life as a Royal she was hounded by the press (she used the press too, I must add), but she wanted to be left alone byt he end. Now it's still happening, even now she is dead!
Aog and Andrea both make good points.
The royal family does have a lot to lose in having her killed but Charles was in love with Camila to the point of getting rid Of DIana to please her. After all Camilla would never have been aloud to marry Charles let alone become queen so long as Diana lived. This way there was no obstical to gaining what she wanted.
This whole thing would have been far simpler to do 2-300 years ago, getting rid of an unwanted royal wife was easy, just look at the history books, but it takes a lot more cunning now.
It sounds odd but there are two many unanswered qustions and to many people on the royal bank roll.
But the big question is Just how far would Charles go for Camilla?
The royal family does have a lot to lose in having her killed but Charles was in love with Camila to the point of getting rid Of DIana to please her. After all Camilla would never have been aloud to marry Charles let alone become queen so long as Diana lived. This way there was no obstical to gaining what she wanted.
This whole thing would have been far simpler to do 2-300 years ago, getting rid of an unwanted royal wife was easy, just look at the history books, but it takes a lot more cunning now.
It sounds odd but there are two many unanswered qustions and to many people on the royal bank roll.
But the big question is Just how far would Charles go for Camilla?
Two things have always bothered me about the 'accident'. Why on earth did the Alma tunnel not have guard rails (and still doesn't to this day) and why didn't she put on her seat belt, especially as the car was travelling at a reckless speed and as alledged she feared she may be in a car crash. It beggars belief.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.