Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
The Edl Do Not Condone Violence As A Way Of Furthering Their Cause
I truly believe that (maintains a straight face).
That being the case - should they be encouraged to organise a 'Not In Our Name' march in order to distance themselves from the recent rise in attacks on Muslim mosques and schools.
There is no evidence to suggest that the EDL are in any way responsible for these recent attacks, but if it turns out that these arson attacks have been carried out by people associated with the EDL, or heaven forfend, the BNP - is it not sensible to demand that they take to the streets to protect their good name?
(Wow...I was able to type that last sentence without my finger pads bursting into flame - wonders indeed will never cease).
That being the case - should they be encouraged to organise a 'Not In Our Name' march in order to distance themselves from the recent rise in attacks on Muslim mosques and schools.
There is no evidence to suggest that the EDL are in any way responsible for these recent attacks, but if it turns out that these arson attacks have been carried out by people associated with the EDL, or heaven forfend, the BNP - is it not sensible to demand that they take to the streets to protect their good name?
(Wow...I was able to type that last sentence without my finger pads bursting into flame - wonders indeed will never cease).
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.aog, your link shows that Tommy Robinson should be heard. He was brilliant logical and fair all through. Well, he got himself convicted in his last few words,but he was good up to that point. And Sarah Montague is not the best cross-examiner. Any counsel hearing him would be salivating at the chance.
Here is another example of the "articulate" nature of the EDL :::
Notice that this chap appears to have two names Stephen Lennon and Tommy Robinson. Not sure why ?
I'm sure that we call all agree that while Sarah Montague may not be every bodies "best" cross-examiner, nobody could seriously argue that Mr Paxman is in any way lacking in this department.
Notice that this chap appears to have two names Stephen Lennon and Tommy Robinson. Not sure why ?
I'm sure that we call all agree that while Sarah Montague may not be every bodies "best" cross-examiner, nobody could seriously argue that Mr Paxman is in any way lacking in this department.
Naomi
SP has wafted off on his hols, he said he didn't say this, he did, and i was annoyed over the comment, it was one of AOG's threads back in May.
quote
Like Australia?
And I welcome a greater mix of colours to the UK. We should have a rainbow of colours and backgounds - like Brazil.
No problem with white Britons being in a minority at all.
unquote
Brazil has as many problems as anywhere, if some think it's a paradise better have a look at the poverty levels.
SP has wafted off on his hols, he said he didn't say this, he did, and i was annoyed over the comment, it was one of AOG's threads back in May.
quote
Like Australia?
And I welcome a greater mix of colours to the UK. We should have a rainbow of colours and backgounds - like Brazil.
No problem with white Britons being in a minority at all.
unquote
Brazil has as many problems as anywhere, if some think it's a paradise better have a look at the poverty levels.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.