ChatterBank0 min ago
Further To My Recent Post "is That An Occupation"?
10 Answers
http:// www.exp ress.co .uk/new s/royal /419749 /Palace -inques t-after -Prince -Willia m-names -Kate-a s-his-P rincess
It would seem there is even a confusion if the Dutchess of Cambridge is even a Princess.
It would seem there is even a confusion if the Dutchess of Cambridge is even a Princess.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Also this article:
http:// fullfac t.org/f actchec ks/the_ royal_f amily_a re_we_g etting_ our_mon ey_s_wo rth-273 30
Which suggests that the £33million in tax costs is more than outweighed by assets and tourism. Running into billions. Drain on the public purse? Nonsense.
http://
Which suggests that the £33million in tax costs is more than outweighed by assets and tourism. Running into billions. Drain on the public purse? Nonsense.
It does appear that protocl dictates that the Duchess is not, as yet, a princess because marrying a prince does not automatically confer that title - as is shown by Camilla.
The more relaxed approach combined with a desire to be seen as forward-looking means that the palace is not getting its knickers in a twist in the way it would have done years ago.
The more relaxed approach combined with a desire to be seen as forward-looking means that the palace is not getting its knickers in a twist in the way it would have done years ago.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.