@AoG What? I am not sure what that last post was all about at all.
Once upon a time, when people talked about child sexual abuse at all, the only spectre raised was "stranger danger" - the notion of some shadowy paedophile lurking around, luring kids away on the promise of some sweeties. Unfortunately, that is not the reality. Many kids who are targets for sexual abuse are abused by family members, tragically.
The point that we should not be forcing our kids to administer a peck on the cheek of a visiting relative, simply out of some kind of social convention and desire that aunt mildred or granny not be offended seems fair enough to me.
Much of this outrage seems to be generated from folks who have interpreted Lucy Emmersons comments to mean that and enforced peck on the cheek is the first stage in child sexual abuse - the author is saying nothing of the sort, as best as I can tell.
Children should not be coerced into physical displays of affection simply because a relative wants it, and they should be taught this early. How can anyone possibly object to that?