News1 min ago
Should Mods
be allowed to moderate threads that they they have already been contributors to?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by davebro3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.https:/
sorry did the spare ed actually say that threads which do not comply with the above will be deleted? or is it simply a request or addendum to etiquette? i cannot see anything in the post which actually threatens removal for posts that use abbreviations or nicknames (which would actually leave "whoo hoo" completely permissible...)
have mods been told to remove posts in news which use abbreviations or nicknames?
i ask because we are forever told that mods do nothing more than enforce Site Rules... but here we have something that is actually not in the Site Rules at all being treated like it is one.
i reckon we should just admit that the mods decide what's permissible on an ad hoc basis and forget the whole thing
another example...
https:/
we were told in april that hate speech would have no place on the answerbank. i saw several posts during the recent riots that i would consider to be hate speech... and i have also been accused of posting it myself. no answer came regarding what "hate speech" is and the statement has effectively been ignored.
let's just admit the rules are made up day to day and none of us will any longer be tormented by the illusion of consistency!
but it isn't a rule naomi. and the "please ensure" refers surely to question authors.
are moderators just there to enforce Site Rules or do they just do what they think is best from moment to moment? i suspect the latter... and if so then that is fine. just admit it and stop pretending!