erm thoughts? Worse in Spain. Doctor wimp stayed in his hotel whilst his adventurous pals broke up the town, and he was indicted and convicted on joint emterprise ( obvio culpabile)
and then
had to come back and tell the GMC why he had been convicted ( a certificate from the juez ( who?-ayth) was sufficient GMC rule diumpty dum)
and successfully pleaded that ( altho another rule says that you specifically CANNOT ) he didernt.....
cannot plead that the certificate isw rong - there is another rule that certificates from judges cant be wrong - ho hum es un moondo funny
since there are alternative charges ( accessory before the fact now assisting an offender I think) - they are specifically saying it was a joint enterprise
The case that astounds me is the teenager who got stabbed in another case was carrying a knife and the defendant still got convicted of murder
They all would have known weapon(s) were being carried
this is called transferred malice for anyone er reading this.
the knowledge of a knife is enough to convert manslaughter ( it was an oops, honest) to Mairder ( die die damn you!)
//Ginger is acquitted. Billy and Barney are under 18 and are to be held indefinitely at Her Majesty's pleasure. Stan, being 18, is sentenced to death.//
// suppose you would give the young scamps a lollipop each & tell them not to be so naughty in the future? //
There are by far, many more people than me who are qualified to work out what is deemed to be an appropriate sentence for this type of crime.
Notwithstanding the Judge handing down a sentence of less than 10 years 'a piece', then knowingly assured it won't be the death penalty, there will be no complaints from me!