Other Sports0 min ago
Finally Some Common Sense
239 Answers
Single-sex schools will be able to reject transgender pupils and teachers can refuse to call children by their preferred pronouns under new Government guidelines
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//A young male person who came to identify as female might not feel at ease in a co-educational school.
Has this plan been fully thought through?//
And a young female may not feel at ease with someone 'identifying' as a female, have you thought this through or dont you care about the majority of women (& men)?
A Co-ed should be perfect for them.
Has this plan been fully thought through?//
And a young female may not feel at ease with someone 'identifying' as a female, have you thought this through or dont you care about the majority of women (& men)?
A Co-ed should be perfect for them.
//A young male person who came to identify as female might not feel at ease in a co-educational school. //
What about all the young girls who might not feel at ease sharing facilities with a boy identifying as female? I don't really know why I'm asking you, sandyRoe. I suspect you have your wooden spoon out again - but it's a topic of conversation I suppose. ;o)
What about all the young girls who might not feel at ease sharing facilities with a boy identifying as female? I don't really know why I'm asking you, sandyRoe. I suspect you have your wooden spoon out again - but it's a topic of conversation I suppose. ;o)
Conversely, does a young trans boy (ie, an FTM trans person) belong in an all-girls' school?
I don't see that this is anything other than reactionary -- and not well thought-through at that. The first point is that it frames all transgender people, young or otherwise, as potential threats, in a way that is grossly unfair and counterproductive. The second point is that, if the intent is ultimately to "discourage" people from being trans, it doesn't even achieve that. Adversarial attitudes tend only to drive people even deeper into whatever is prompting that reaction. The better thing to do is to provide a safe, open environment to explore these thoughts and feelings, and let people come to the conclusion themselves that it was, or wasn't, after all who they were.
If all we're doing is looking for ways to isolate, reject, ostracise these young kids, it's inevitably going to cause damage. Clearly you have to consider the majority too, but that can be done without penalising the minority.
This is Section 28 all over again, just with a different target. It was wrong then; it is wrong now.
I don't see that this is anything other than reactionary -- and not well thought-through at that. The first point is that it frames all transgender people, young or otherwise, as potential threats, in a way that is grossly unfair and counterproductive. The second point is that, if the intent is ultimately to "discourage" people from being trans, it doesn't even achieve that. Adversarial attitudes tend only to drive people even deeper into whatever is prompting that reaction. The better thing to do is to provide a safe, open environment to explore these thoughts and feelings, and let people come to the conclusion themselves that it was, or wasn't, after all who they were.
If all we're doing is looking for ways to isolate, reject, ostracise these young kids, it's inevitably going to cause damage. Clearly you have to consider the majority too, but that can be done without penalising the minority.
This is Section 28 all over again, just with a different target. It was wrong then; it is wrong now.
//if the intent is ultimately to "discourage" people from being trans, //
Rot.
It is to protect the majority. Women should not have penis's in their changing rooms, neither should they be competing against them and all the myriad of issues these few trans activists have caused.
Being trans is not new, many have managed perfectly and still do and would prefer the fuss to die down. The fuss often caused by people who are not trans but taking offence on their behalf.
Rot.
It is to protect the majority. Women should not have penis's in their changing rooms, neither should they be competing against them and all the myriad of issues these few trans activists have caused.
Being trans is not new, many have managed perfectly and still do and would prefer the fuss to die down. The fuss often caused by people who are not trans but taking offence on their behalf.
