Alrighty. Let's review my main arguments, and I'll present evidence where appropriate.
1) It is worth questioning rules and why they are there.
[This isn't an evidence-based claim. It strikes me as a fundmental truth.]
2) School uniforms represent an arbitrary and imposed set of rules.
Therefore: School uniform policies deserve to be questioned.
1) The presence of uniforms, in developed countries, have no discernible impact upon education.
Evidence:
-This 1998 study by Brunsma and Rockquemore:
http://sociology.miss...20on%20Attendance.pdf
This is admittedly an old study, but even in more recent times, the author, David Brunsma, is still talking about it and is still opposed (read his comments in this article:
http://www.guardian.c...ool-uniform-results). There are some others as well, I believe. Will gladly dig them up given some time.
- The widespread nature of non-uniform education in Germany, France, the United States and Canada and other countries, and the fact that this seems to have none of the catastrophic effects that many on here predict it would have here.
2) If school uniforms do not actually benefit education, then there is little other convincing reason to keep them (this is what I spent most of my time refuting, and as far as I can remember I have had nobody come back to me - each of my responses has ultimately been ignored.)
Therefore: We should not sustain school uniform policies.
1) The existing arguments for school uniformity are not based on the direct aim of benefiting children - or maybe they are intended to, but don't for the reasons outlined above. They are, in truth, based on: adults wanting to feel in control, adults being reluctant to help or even tolerate children who are different, and adults not wanting children to question the rules.
Evidence:
- "School is not the place to be a rebel, or 'individual' in appearance. I am fed up of people bleating about their 'rights' whilst totally ignoring their obligations. "
-"as a kid, he (like or not) has to do as he's told."
- "If they cut you in half, what's written inside should be the name of your school ... not "I'm an individual". "
- "Uniformity unfortunately often has to prevail over individual happiness and development"
- "School is not the place to “challenge authority”."
----
Now, all of these arguments are much wider in scope than this particular case - but it does bear on it. I'm attacking why we believe in the rules which have given rise to this particular case.
If you'd like me to go more in depth or gather more evidence, I will happily do so given a bit of time. But I'm aware that I tend to over-write as it is, and people may start wanting to skip it if they don't already....