ChatterBank0 min ago
So Is Qatada To Go Home?
50 Answers
We've signed a treaty with Jordan.....apparently.
Have we really changed the rules of the game?
Why don't we put him on a plane and be done with it? What would the ramifications be except putting two fingers up to the ECHR?
Have we really changed the rules of the game?
Why don't we put him on a plane and be done with it? What would the ramifications be except putting two fingers up to the ECHR?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by DTCwordfan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."he was granted asylum"
the scumbag obviously lied through his teeth
get lawyers to re-visit the appeal and go over it with a fine tooth comb and then find a reason to repeal his asylum.
It is absolutely ludicrous that we cannot decide who to keep and who to get rid of in our own country in matters of security.
The vast majority of people really couldnt give a damn what happens to him, they just want this lying scrounging trash out of this country.
the scumbag obviously lied through his teeth
get lawyers to re-visit the appeal and go over it with a fine tooth comb and then find a reason to repeal his asylum.
It is absolutely ludicrous that we cannot decide who to keep and who to get rid of in our own country in matters of security.
The vast majority of people really couldnt give a damn what happens to him, they just want this lying scrounging trash out of this country.
Baz,
Qatada's trial in his absence in Jordan used evidence likely to have been obtained by torture. It was probably therefore unreliable. His sentence was life with hard labour. It is not difficult to see how he was able to convince the authorities here that he would himself be tortured if he were to be returned to Jordan and so he was granted asylum. Coupled with the fact that MI5 had an interest in him as an informant, that too probably influenced the judgement allowing him to stay.
Qatada's trial in his absence in Jordan used evidence likely to have been obtained by torture. It was probably therefore unreliable. His sentence was life with hard labour. It is not difficult to see how he was able to convince the authorities here that he would himself be tortured if he were to be returned to Jordan and so he was granted asylum. Coupled with the fact that MI5 had an interest in him as an informant, that too probably influenced the judgement allowing him to stay.
Ymb,
// Let him walk free... I dont reckon he would be around long, either by his own choice or vigilantes. //
That is remarkedly similar to Qatada's hate speeches. He said it was fine to kill American's, Jews. You say it is fine to let the vigilantes at this fanatical cleric.
But we live in a country that allows free speech so you are OK to air your views no matter how distasteful they may be.
I think I have asked you before, what crime do you think he has commited?
// Let him walk free... I dont reckon he would be around long, either by his own choice or vigilantes. //
That is remarkedly similar to Qatada's hate speeches. He said it was fine to kill American's, Jews. You say it is fine to let the vigilantes at this fanatical cleric.
But we live in a country that allows free speech so you are OK to air your views no matter how distasteful they may be.
I think I have asked you before, what crime do you think he has commited?
Newsbiscuit has come up with what may be the only plausible solution...
http:// www.new sbiscui t.com/2 013/04/ 24/abu- qatada- stays-e veryone -else-g oes-rul es-gove rnment/
http://