Donate SIGN UP

The Commons Have Voted Against War With Syria

Avatar Image
Gromit | 21:35 Thu 29th Aug 2013 | News
190 Answers
David Cameron's plans for war have been rejected in a House of Commons vote tonight. The Hovernment have lost control of its own foreign policy and Dave has been dealt a humiliating defeat, which will embarrass him abroad.

Common sense prevails?
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 190rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Avatar Image
thankfully, a genuinely back from the brink decision tonight I think, at least there was some above party politics stuff going on
23:23 Thu 29th Aug 2013
I was siding with you jim.

Personally I too think we should stay out of it but I just get a little sad at how gromit and co seem to revel in The PM trying to do something and not getting anywhere. I just wonder how they would react if Millipede was the PM doing the same, as in a certain Mr Blair some years ago.

There was not a vote on a war, but a vote on whether we should assist in any action taken by the west, mostly the US. Britain has not decalred war since 1942, still add a bit of drama eh!
Well, that'll teach me to read before I type then! Sorry TTT.
If Milliband was PM, I think I'd go live in Syria.
Just a comment on the Churchill confidence vote of 1942 (the relevance of which mind you I'm at a loss to see). Motion carried 464 to 1
Does anyone know who the "one" was ?!
Churchill. He was so confident and yes, totally different circumstances, as I've already said.
what has the 1942 confidence vote got to do with this thread?
James Maxton, if I've read Hansard correctly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Maxton
TTT, if it wasn't that which you referred to earlier, then what were you referring to?
Question Author
// I just get a little sad at how gromit and co seem to revel in The PM trying to do something and not getting anywhere. I just wonder how they would react if Millipede was the PM doing the same, as in a certain Mr Blair some years ago. //

I was against the Iraq war and the only 'demo' I have ever been on was the one against us going there. Just as much as I am please that Cameron has been defeated, I was equally dissappointed that Tony Liar succeeded in dragging us into Iraq.
Don't know about Milliband being Prime Minister what about slime ball Clegg.I wouldn't believe him ever again. Hope he moves to Spain with his wife.
Sorry Gromit this vote will not embarrass the PM abroad, they all know he has a minority backed by a load of liberal Jellies when it suits them and an opposition who wouldn't flinch from using the plight of Syria to help inflict a defeat. In fact this would have done him a lot of favours with the world community, even the French have been talking about doing something! Obama will be well aware of the company Cameron is forced to entertain.
If Miliband was prime minister I would know for sure that the lunatics had taken over the asylum.........
I'm still intrigued to know what the 1942 vote you referred to was, TTT.
good news, in my opinion. Too many interventions, well-meaning or not, have failed miserably.

MPs voted against it even if weapons inspectors' evidence supported the case for intervention. Cameron has acknowledged that the British people just don't want to go there. At least he hasn't simply ignored their wishes as Blair did.
Zacs gib me fifty knicker and I ' ll tell you

I suspect it was on the conduct course of the war
and the person speaking against the motion, was swaying the House
andthen said..... and I think the commander in chief should be Prince Henry og Gloucester.- - - (yeah he ex drug addict)

and Churchill whispered.... o God you have delivered my enemies into my hands....

anyway good story and gets a well deserved airing
Question Author
Tora Tora Tora, Cameron has not embarrassed himself?

He marched them up to the top of the hill, and he marched them down again.
Cameron has been enticing the Americans all week and then stands them up. Deeply damaging.
grumpy there is 0 chance of Clegg Becomming PM. Deputy PM is not even an oficial position and it is definately not number 2.
On that note, I bid thes all a good night. To sleep perchance to dream.....
When all's said and done there is no real stomach for this from the British government either.
If there was there would never have been a vote.
The time for meaningful action was years ago, but we were trying to go down the UN route which is doomed. It was interesting to hear the excellent General Lord Dannatt still banging on about the UN security council to adopt a unanimous position. There was no chance of that in 2011 and there's no chance of it now.
Just out of interest, was declaring war between the UK and Syria ever an option?

41 to 60 of 190rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The Commons Have Voted Against War With Syria

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.