Donate SIGN UP

The Commons Have Voted Against War With Syria

Avatar Image
Gromit | 21:35 Thu 29th Aug 2013 | News
190 Answers
David Cameron's plans for war have been rejected in a House of Commons vote tonight. The Hovernment have lost control of its own foreign policy and Dave has been dealt a humiliating defeat, which will embarrass him abroad.

Common sense prevails?
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 190rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Avatar Image
thankfully, a genuinely back from the brink decision tonight I think, at least there was some above party politics stuff going on
23:23 Thu 29th Aug 2013
Zacs, I was talking about the last official Declaration of war in the UK and the vote hat would have preceeded it. It was against Thialand.
"Just out of interest, was declaring war between the UK and Syria ever an option? "

No
I'm relieved we're not going to war (again) but do worry about the innocent civilian casualties in Syria.
I don't think Cameron has suffered a humiliating defeat, unlike Bliar he has accepted the will of parliament.
Question Author
237SJ

You are right. There was never a Falklands War.
Thanks TTT. Must look that up. Sounds even more irrelevant than I first thought.
There was never a Falklands war . War was never declared between Argentina and the UK although, I can`t see that that has to do with Syria. There won`t be a war with Syria.
it's only relevant as a tool to point out the hysterical language of the OP.
It was a strange Montypythonesque year for declaring war I see:
6 January 1942 – Australia declared war on Bulgaria.
25 January 1942 – Great Britain, New Zealand and the Union of South Africa declare war on Thailand.
22 May 1942 – Mexico declared war on Germany, Italy and Japan.
22 August 1942 – Brazil declared war on Germany and Italy.
Question Author
// unlike Bliar he has accepted the will of parliament. //

I hate to defend Tony Liar, but on Iraq, the will of Parliament was..

For: 217
Against: 396

Majority in favour of military intervention: 179
Question Author
Of course, Blair had a huge majority and authority over his MPs.
Cameron doesn't.
Well, the coalition has been good for one thing then!
Well I'm pleased with the vote. I feel for the innocents in Syria. IMO by backing the rebels you will also be backing Al-Qa'ida, yet they are supposed to be the enemy.
"There was never a Falklands war . War was never declared between Argentina and the UK although, I can`t see that that has to do with Syria. There won`t be a war with Syria. "

Quite so. Except there might be but not involving Britain. Perhaps it's the best way. We can sit back and watch - and as Bob Stewart MP suggested, if it all goes well then perhaps there'll be politicians in future claiming they were always really in favour of action, just as nowadays, mysteriously, given the timely reminder from Gromit of the Iraq vote, there are a lot of politicians who probably regret supporting that, (using the convenient excuse of the "dodgy dossier")
Was that a free vote Gromit with all relevant details truthfully given?
Question Author
A good day for:
Parliament
The British People
British Military Personel
The UN
The British Tax Payer

A bad day for:
Cameron
Hague
Clegg
Milliband
The US
The Special Relationship
where do you put Syria in that list Gromit?
Question Author
// Was that a free vote Gromit with all relevant details truthfully given? //

It was not a free vote, there was a three line whip. A Labour MP resigned the whip to vote against his party. Many many more coalition MPs defyed the whip which is how the Government was defeated. Backbench Tory MPs have made this result, not Labour MPs.
Question Author
// where do you put Syria in that list Gromit? //

It was neither a good or bad day for Syria. The British involvement would probably be miniscule and just to give the US a smidgin of legitimacy for whatever they do in Syria. It might make a military intervention slightly less likely, but my guess is the the US were the puppet masters here all along and they will still do whatever they want whether the UK is involved or not.
Says the man who calls people from the Mid East "camel shaggers" and expects to be taken seriously :-)
Question Author
237SJ

That was directed at Saudia Arabia, the chief financers of Islamic Terrorism throughout the world.

It was also said in jest.

61 to 80 of 190rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The Commons Have Voted Against War With Syria

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.